← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

IFNg shapes macrophage inflammatory responses by STAT1 isoform-specific epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms

GSE309503 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 143 samples Submitted 2025/09/30 Platform GPL21103
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 143 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
143 samples: 48 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
IFNγ shapes macrophage inflammatory responses by STAT1 isoform-specific epigenetic and transcriptional mechanismsBMC genomics · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Interferon gamma (IFNg) is a pivotal cytokine that activates macrophages and shapes their response to subsequent inflammatory stimuli. Here, we investigated the distinct roles of STAT1 isoforms, STAT1alpha and STAT1beta, in IFNg-induced epigenetic remodelling and subsequent responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in primary macrophages.
Read the full summary ↓
We show that the STAT1 C-terminal TAD, which is missing in the STAT1beta isoform, is required for both H3K27 acetylation and deacetylation in response to IFNg. Notably, H3K27 deacetylation was associated with AP-1 motifs rather than STAT1 binding, suggesting indirect regulatory mechanisms. Functionally, IFNg pretreatment suppressed the induction of anti-inflammatory and virus response genes, including a subset of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), in response to LPS, while enhancing the expression of a distinct set of ISGs. Mechanistically, the STAT1 C-terminal TAD was critical for IFNg-mediated inhibition of LPS-induced enhancer activation at key regulatory genes, such as Il10 and Irak3, which are involved in negative feedback of toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling. Conversely, cooperative gene activation by IFNg and LPS was largely independent of the STAT1 C-terminal TAD, with notable exceptions, such as Ido1 and Tgtp1. Genome-wide analysis indicated that IRF1 and IRF8, rather than STAT1 homodimers, predominantly mediate in IFNg-induced H3K27 acetylation and transcription factor network analysis identified additional regulators integrating IFNg and LPS responses. Together, these findings reveal gene- and isoform-specific roles of STAT1 in coordinating IFNg-dependent chromatin remodelling and transcriptional cross-regulation, providing new insights into the control of inflammation and innate immunity.
Published in
IFNγ shapes macrophage inflammatory responses by STAT1 isoform-specific epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms
Akagha MJ, Georgolopoulos G, Martin D et al. · BMC genomics 2026 · PMID 41645061 · doi:10.1186/s12864-026-12601-5
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE309503_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1336180 and SRA study SRP629465. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
48 conditions, mostly in triplicate
ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1alpha KI,… ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1alpha KI,… ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1alpha KI,… ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1alpha KI,… ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1beta KI, … ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1beta KI, … ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1beta KI, … ×3 ChIP-Seq, H3K27ac, Macrophage, STAT1beta KI, … ×3 +40 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 143 samples.

How we read this: 48 replicated groups read from 143 sample titles; they account for 143 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 103 more — browse all 143 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.