← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Immunosuppressive monocytes are enriched in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver dysfunction in a phase II trial of combination sorafenib and nivolumab [CITE-Seq]

GSE313642 Homo sapiens (human) Single-cell RNA-seq 194 samples Submitted 2025/12/12 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · human · 194 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
194 samples: 38 conditions, mostly in duplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Phase II trial with nivolumab and sorafenib in HCC identified enrichment of immunosuppressive monocytes in patients with Child-Pugh B liver dysfunctionJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Background and aims: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and anti-angiogenic therapies are active in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although patients with impaired hepatic function have worse outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, open-label phase II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the multikinase inhibitor, sorafenib, combined with nivolumab, in patients with advanced or unresectable HCC and varying liver function.
Read the full summary ↓
In a Part 1 safety lead-in, we investigated the primary endpoint of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination in patients with Child-Pugh A or B7 HCC. In Part 2, we enrolled patients with Child-Pugh B HCC with the primary endpoint of grade >/=3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) incidence. Exploratory endpoints included immunologic biomarkers. Results: Overall, 25 patients were consented and 16 eligible patients enrolled. In Part 1, dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1 of 6 patients in Dose Level -1, and 2 of 5 patients in Dose Level 1; Dose Level -1 was determined to be the MTD. In total, 69% of patients experienced a Grade >/=3 TRAE, with similar distribution for patients with Child-Pugh A and B liver function (70%, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.93 vs 66.7%, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.96). The objective response rate was 6%. We found that patients with Child-Pugh B liver disease harbored more circulating suppressive CD14+ monocytes at baseline. Conclusions: While the combination of sorafenib and nivolumab demonstrated acceptable safety at the MTD in both Child-Pugh subgroups, the objective response rate was below the pre-specified threshold to be declared worthy of further exploration. A distinct immune cell profile in Child-Pugh B patients may define mechanisms of resistance and potential therapeutic targets in this population with unmet clinical need
Published in
Phase II trial with nivolumab and sorafenib in HCC identified enrichment of immunosuppressive monocytes in patients with Child-Pugh B liver dysfunction
Keenan BP, Fan Z, Le BK et al. · JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology 2026 · PMID 41831609 · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101817
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE313642_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1380453 and SRA study SRP654876. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
38 conditions, mostly in duplicate
PBMC healthy donor scRNA-seq replicate 3 ×10 PBMC healthy donor CITE-seq replicate 3 ×10 PBMC healthy donor scRNA-seq replicate 1 ×6 PBMC healthy donor CITE-seq replicate 1 ×6 PBMC healthy donor scRNA-seq replicate 2 ×5 PBMC healthy donor CITE-seq replicate 2 ×5 HCC PBMC patient A-33 timepoint C1D1 scRNA-seq ×3 HCC PBMC patient A-33 timepoint C1D1 CITE-seq ×3 +116 more

Supports a case/control comparison: 134 samples read as cases, 42 as controls.

How we read this: 38 replicated groups read from 194 sample titles; they account for 108 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 154 more — browse all 194 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.