← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

KLF2 overrides the resident memory CD8 T cell differentiation program, in opposition to KLF3

GSE322657 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 10 samples Submitted 2026/03/10 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 10 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
10 samples: 4 × CnT_D8_aKLF2 vs 2 × CnT_D8_aIgG vs 2 × CnT_n_aKLF2 vs 2 × CnT_n_aIgGGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
KLF2 overrides the resident memory CD8 T cell differentiation program, in opposition to KLF3Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Numerous transcriptional regulators have been associated with the differentiation pathways that lead to recirculating versus tissue-resident memory T cells. However, it is unclear whether independent, coordinated expression of these regulators is required to determine residency versus recirculation, or whether there is a hierarchy, with some factors playing a dominant role in controlling T cell trafficking.
Read the full summary ↓
We report that ablation of the gene encoding Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) during CD8+ T cell activation leads to rapid transcriptional reprograming, such that effector T cells fail to recirculate and prematurely acquire canonical phenotypic and transcriptional characteristics of resident memory cells (TRM). Klf2-deficient memory CD8+ T cells retained the capacity to undergo recall responses, including in vivo pathogen control. These data suggest KLF2 diverts CD8+ T cells from the TRM differentiation program. In contrast, ablation of another member of the KLF family, KLF3, enhanced differentiation of some recirculating T cell subsets and limited production of TRM in lymphoid tissues. However, both KLF2 and KLF3 were required for differentiation of long-lived effector cells, suggesting cooperation between these factors in some situations. These findings indicate KLFs occupy a central nexus in coordinating activated CD8+ T cell differentiation and trafficking.
Published in
KLF2 overrides the resident memory CD8 T cell differentiation program, in opposition to KLF3
DePauw TA, Gai K, Shen J et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2026 · PMID 41871244 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2533700123
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE322657_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1430833 and SRA study SRP680340. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
4 × CnT_D8_aKLF2 vs 2 × CnT_D8_aIgG vs 2 × CnT_n_aKLF2 vs 2 × CnT_n_aIgG

Supports a between-group comparison across 10 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 10 sample titles; they account for 10 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.