← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Lineage and Organ Signals Sequentially Build Organ Intrinsic Nervous Systems [scRNA-seq]

GSE322764 Mus musculus (mouse) Single-cell RNA-seq 19 samples Submitted 2026/03/16 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · mouse · 19 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
19 samples: 19 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Lineage and organ signals sequentially build organ intrinsic nervous systemsNature · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Organ intrinsic nervous systems (OINSs) are critical components of the body–brain axis, coordinating visceral organ function with systemic physiological control. Despite their importance, how these distinct neural architectures arise from a common neural crest cell (NCC) origin has remained unclear. Here, we present a systems-level, cross-organ analysis of OINS development, integrating lineage tracing, 3D imaging, single-cell transcriptomics, and genetic perturbations across heart, pancreas, intestine, and lungs.
Read the full summary ↓
We show that differences in NCC migratory trajectories prefigure the spatial architecture of OINSs, laying the foundation for organ-specific patterning. In contrast, molecular identity emerges largely in response to local environments, indicating that extrinsic cues play a major instructive role. Using in vitro co-cultures, we demonstrate that organ-derived cues reprogram intrinsic neurons toward organ-specific transcriptional profiles and direct neuronal differentiation, with extracellular matrix (ECM) contact identified as a central mediator. In vivo, ECM–integrin signaling supports intrinsic cardiac neuron neurogenesis, while ECM crosslinking stabilizes their stereotyped ganglionic organization. Together, these findings reveal that OINS diversity arises through a dual logic: lineage programs prefigure spatial frameworks, while organ-specific cues instruct final molecular identities and architectural precision. This work establishes a conceptual paradigm for how organs actively build their own nervous systems, illuminating principles that underpin body–brain integration.
Published in
Lineage and organ signals sequentially build organ intrinsic nervous systems
Hsu IY, Zhao J, Lin Y et al. · Nature 2026 · PMID 42129551 · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10490-y
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE322764_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1431444 and SRA study SRP680734. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
19 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 19 sample titles: 19 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.