← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Distinct temporal patterns of liver immune responses to pathogenic and non-pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica clones

GSE329300 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 29 samples Submitted 2026/05/11 Platform GPL21103
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 29 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
29 samples: 7 conditions, mostly with about 4 replicates eachGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Entamoeba histolytica is a protozoan parasite that can cause severe liver disease known as amoebic liver abscess. However, only a subset of infected individuals develops invasive disease, indicating that host-parasite interactions are critical determinants of disease outcome. In this study, we investigated the clone-specific modulation of hepatic immune responses using the non-pathogenic A1np and the pathogenic B2p E.
Read the full summary ↓
histolytica clones. Time-resolved transcriptome analyses (6, 12, 24 hours post-infection, (hpi)) in a murine model revealed distinct immune trajectories. Both clones activated innate immune pathways early after infection, but their responses differed markedly in magnitude and composition. A1np infection induced a rapid and controlled inflammatory response associated with antimicrobial activity and resolution-promoting signalling. In contrast, B2p infection triggered a stronger and more complex immune response characterised by pronounced cytokine and chemokine expression, activation of stress and redox pathways, and tissue remodelling processes. By 24 hpi, the B2p induced response exhibited features of excessive immune activation, accompanied by the upregulation of counter-regulation genes such as Ackr2 and Il1rn. These findings indicate that liver pathology is not solely determined by parasite presence, but rather by the nature and regulation of the host immune response. Overall, the observed differences between A1np and B2p infections suggest that parasite-specific properties shape hepatic immune activation and may influence disease progression.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE329300_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1458583 and SRA study SRP695530. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
7 conditions, mostly with about 4 replicates each
Control, sample ×5 Clone A1, 6 hpi, sample ×4 Clone A1, 12 hpi, sample ×4 Clone A1, 24 hpi, sample ×4 Clone B2, 6 hpi, sample ×4 Clone B2, 12 hpi, sample ×4 Clone B2, 24 hpi, sample ×4

Supports a between-group comparison across 29 samples.

How we read this: 7 replicated groups read from 29 sample titles; they account for 29 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.