← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

RNA-seq differential expression studies: more sequence, or more replication?

GSE51403 Homo sapiens Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing 14 samples Submitted 2014/01/07 Platform GPL11154
Summary
Motivation: RNA-seq is replacing microarrays as the primary tool for gene expression studies. Many RNA-seq studies have used insufficient biological replicates, resulting in low statistical power and inefficient use of sequencing resources. Results: We show the explicit trade-off between more biological replicates and deeper sequencing in increasing power to detect differentially expressed (DE) genes. In the human cell line MCF-7, adding more sequencing depth after 10M reads gives diminishing returns on power to detect DE genes, while adding biological replicates improves power significantly regardless of sequencing depth. We also propose a cost-effectiveness metric for guiding the design of large scale RNA-seq DE studies. Our analysis showed that sequencing less reads and perform more biological replication is an effective strategy to increase power and accuracy in large scale differential expression RNA-seq studies, and provided new insights into efficient experiment design of RNA-seq studies
This dataset
Download

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form: the whole study as GSE51403_RAW.tar, processed values as the series matrix, the supplementary file directory, and per-sample supplementary files for any of the 14 samples. Raw sequencing reads are also available from ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA222975 and SRA study SRP031476. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Samples in this study

The sample list for this study is not cached yet. Press Sort into groups and it will be fetched from NCBI.

+ 14 more — browse all 14 samples with per-sample file links →

Similar datasets

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.