← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Influence of low-input RNA from FF and FFPE samples on gene expression quantification by NanoString, microarray and RNA-seq: a comparative study

GSE117678 Mus musculus (mouse) Expression microarray 206 samples Submitted 2024/07/19 Platform GPL13112Platform GPL25385Platform GPL25383
At a glance

Expression microarray · mouse · 206 samples

What it is
Expression microarrayGene activity read on a chip (the older technology that RNA-seq replaced).
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
206 samples: 206 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed expression table (series matrix) and the array files, from NCBI.
SuperSeries — this record groups several sub-series.
Summary (written by the submitters)
This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE117678_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For arrays the series matrix is normally the normalised expression table you want; the raw array files (CEL and similar) are in the RAW.tar.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA483003 and SRA study SRP155276. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
206 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 206 sample titles: 206 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 166 more — browse all 206 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.