← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

AP-3-84 effects on gene expression in thioglycollate-induced, ID8 ascites or bone-marrow derived macrophages

GSE239479 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 48 samples Submitted 2024/07/26 Platform GPL30172
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 48 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
48 samples: 12 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Targeting LxCxE Cleft Pocket of Retinoblastoma Protein in Immunosuppressive Macrophages Inhibits Ovarian Cancer ProgressionCancer immunology research · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Here we studied the effects of AP-3-84 treatment on gene expression in different types of macrophages: thioglycollate-induced macrophages, ascites macrophages from ID8 ovarian cancer-bearing mice, bone marrow-derived macrophages. We also studied whether AP-3-84 effects are mediated by p53 using bone marrow-derived macrophages from p53 KO mice. We found the dramatic changes in gene expression upon AP-3-84 treatment in all types of macrophages with the induction of major stress response programs and apoptosis signaling.
Published in
Targeting LxCxE Cleft Pocket of Retinoblastoma Protein in Immunosuppressive Macrophages Inhibits Ovarian Cancer Progression
Tcyganov EN, Kwak T, Yang X et al. · Cancer immunology research 2025 · PMID 40923906 · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-24-0440
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE239479_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA999363 and SRA study SRP451833. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
12 conditions, mostly in triplicate
WT.M0.D ×3 WT.M0.A ×3 WT.M1.D ×3 WT.M1.A ×3 WT.M2.D ×3 WT.M2.A ×3 KO.M0.D ×3 KO.M0.A ×3 +16 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 36 samples.

How we read this: 12 replicated groups read from 48 sample titles; they account for 36 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 8 more — browse all 48 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.