← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Histone modification in dendritic cell progenitors and dendritic cells

GSE239738 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 42 samples Submitted 2024/04/24 Platform GPL19057
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 42 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
42 samples: 14 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
To understand the roles of Irf8 3’ enhancers on Irf8 expression during cDC1 differentiation, we performed Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) analysis for H3K27ac of bone marrow cells and splenocytes from wild-type, and the Irf8 enhancer-deficient mice. Phenotypic analysis and integrated analysis of CUT&Tag data with transcriptome data of these mouse mononuclear phagocytic lineage cells revealed that the +56 kb enhancer acts on other 3′ enhancers via an IRF8-dependent TF program and the +32 kb enhancer acts in cis to activate other 3′ enhancers.
This dataset
Open GSE239738 in finder → Find more mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE239738_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1000792 and SRA study SRP452481. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗
Study design
14 conditions, mostly in triplicate
WT_MDP_H3K27ac ×3 WT_CDP_H3K27ac ×3 WT_cDC1_H3K27ac ×3 WT_in vitro_MDP_H3K27ac ×3 WT_in vitro_CDP_H3K27ac ×3 WT_in vitro_pre-cDC1_H3K27ac ×3 WT_in vitro_cDC1_H3K27ac ×3 d+56het_cDC1_H3K27ac ×3 +6 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 42 samples.

How we read this: 14 replicated groups read from 42 sample titles; they account for 42 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 2 more — browse all 42 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.