← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Ki67-mediated chromatin accessibility impedes B-cell antigen-receptor gene rearrangement

GSE246986 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 24 samples Submitted 2024/05/31 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 24 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
24 samples: 6 conditions, mostly with about 4 replicates eachGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Ki67 deficiency impedes chromatin accessibility and BCR gene rearrangementThe Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
B and T cells can recognise and respond to a vast array of foreign pathogens by virtue of the diverse antigen-receptor repertoire generated by gene rearrangement during development. Here, we show that deficiency in Ki67, a nuclear protein ubiquitously expressed throughout the cell cycle, impairs B-cell development at specific, early stages.
Read the full summary ↓
We identified that Ki67 maintains global chromatin accessibility in lymphocyte progenitors at stages where antigen-receptor gene rearrangements occur and that gene rearrangement is less efficient in the absence of Ki67. That the defects in B cell development are caused by disrupted antigen-receptor gene rearrangement is shown by pre-rearranged antigen-receptor genes fully compensating for loss of Ki67. Collectively, these results identify a unique contribution from Ki67 to somatic antigen-receptor gene rearrangement.
Published in
Ki67 deficiency impedes chromatin accessibility and BCR gene rearrangement
Ding Z, Hagan M, Yan F et al. · The Journal of experimental medicine 2024 · PMID 38842525 · doi:10.1084/jem.20232160
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE246986_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1035491 and SRA study SRP470112. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 conditions, mostly with about 4 replicates each
WT Pre-pro-B ×4 Mki67-/- Pre-pro-B ×4 WT Pro-B ×4 Mki67-/- Pro-B ×4 WT Small pre-B ×4 Mki67-/- Small pre-B ×4

Supports a between-group comparison across 24 samples.

How we read this: 6 replicated groups read from 24 sample titles; they account for 24 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.