← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Transient promoter interactions modulate developmental gene activation [ChIPseq]

GSE261039 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 157 samples Submitted 2024/10/29 Platform GPL21626
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 157 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
157 samples: 157 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Transient promoter interactions modulate developmental gene activationMolecular cell · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Transcriptional induction coincides with the formation of various chromatin topologies, including loss and gain of physical interactions between promoters and distal regulatory elements (DREs). Strong evidence supports that gene activation is accompanied by a general increase in promoter-enhancer interactions. However, it remains unclear how these topological changes are coordinated across time and space to collectively enable transcription.
Read the full summary ↓
Here we combine chromatin conformation capture with profiling of histone modifications, RNA polymerase II and transcription during an embryonic stem cell differentiation time-course to determine how 3D genome restructuring is related to transcriptional transitions. Using this approach, our data identifies distinct topological alterations that are associated with the magnitude of transcriptional induction. We detect transiently formed interactions between gene promoters and DREs and demonstrate by genetic deletions that these DREs can contribute to the transcriptional induction of associated genes. Finally, by acutely depleting cohesin, we interfere with early transient promoter-enhancer interactions, and show that this impairs the activation of linked genes. Taken together, our study identifies typical topological alterations during gene activation, links them to the magnitude of transcriptional induction, and detects an uncharacterized type of transcriptional enhancers. Our data are compatible with a model where the type of topological pattern that a promoter displays during developmental transitions and the dynamics and magnitude of its transcriptional induction are interdependent.
Published in
Transient promoter interactions modulate developmental gene activation
Mahara S, Prüssing S, Smialkovska V et al. · Molecular cell 2024 · PMID 39476844 · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.10.005
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE261039_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1084859 and SRA study SRP493723. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
157 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 157 sample titles: 157 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 117 more — browse all 157 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.