← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

The microglial response to inhibition of Colony-Stimulating-Factor-1 Receptor by PLX3397 differs by sex in adult mice

GSE278897 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 16 samples Submitted 2024/10/06 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 16 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
16 samples: 4 × Microglia, Male 1 wk PLX, sample vs 4 × Microlgia, Male 1 wk Control, sample vs 4 × Microglia, Female 1 wk PLX, sample vs 4 × Microlgia, Female 1 wk Control, sampleGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
The microglial response to inhibition of Colony-stimulating-factor-1 receptor by PLX3397 differs by sex in adult miceCell reports · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Microglia, the resident macrophage of the brain, are derived from the yolk sac and colonize the brain before the blood-brain barrier forms. Once established, they expand locally and require Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling for their development and maintenance. CSF1R inhibitors have been used extensively to deplete microglia in the healthy and diseased brain.
Read the full summary ↓
In this study, we demonstrated sex-dependent differences in the microglial response to the CSF1R inhibitor PLX3397. Male mice exhibited greater microglial depletion compared to females. Transcriptomic and flow cytometry analysis revealed sex-specific differences in the remaining microglia population, with female microglia upregulating autophagy and proteostasis pathways while male microglia increased mitobiogenesis. Furthermore, manipulating key microglial receptors by using different transgenic mouse lines resulted in changes in depletion efficacies that were also sex-dependent. These findings suggest sex-dependent microglial survival mechanisms, which might contribute to the well-documented sex differences in various neurological disorders.
Published in
The microglial response to inhibition of Colony-stimulating-factor-1 receptor by PLX3397 differs by sex in adult mice
Le LHD, Eliseeva S, Plunk E et al. · Cell reports 2025 · PMID 39842435 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115176
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE278897_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1169374 and SRA study SRP536823. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
4 × Microglia, Male 1 wk PLX, sample vs 4 × Microlgia, Male 1 wk Control, sample vs 4 × Microglia, Female 1 wk PLX, sample vs 4 × Microlgia, Female 1 wk Control, sample

Supports a between-group comparison across 16 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 16 sample titles; they account for 16 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.