← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Intersecting impact of CAG repeat and Huntingtin knockout in stem cell-derived cortical neurons [cortical]

GSE282626 Homo sapiens (human) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 75 samples Submitted 2025/05/05 Platform GPL18573Platform GPL11154
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · human · 75 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
75 samples: 75 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Intersecting impact of CAG repeat and huntingtin knockout in stem cell-derived cortical neuronsNeurobiology of disease · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Huntington’s Disease (HD) is caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the gene encoding Huntingtin (HTT). While normal HTT function appears impacted by the mutation, the specific pathways unique to CAG repeat expansion versus loss of normal function are unclear.
Read the full summary ↓
To understand the impact of the CAG repeat expansion, we evaluated biological signatures of HTT knockout (HTT KO) versus those that occur from the CAG repeat expansion by applying multi-omics, live cell imaging, survival analysis and a novel feature- based pipeline to study cortical neurons (eCNs) derived from an isogenic human embryonic stem cell series (RUES2). HTT KO and the CAG repeat expansion influence developmental trajectories of eCNs, with opposing effects on the growth. Network analyses of differentially expressed genes and proteins associated with enriched epigenetic motifs identified subnetworks common to CAG repeat expansion and HTT KO that include neuronal differentiation, cell cycle regulation, and mechanisms related to transcriptional repression and may represent gain-of-function mechanisms that cannot be explained by HTT loss of function alone. A combination of dominant and loss-of-function mechanisms are likely involved in the aberrant neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative features of HD that can help inform therapeutic strategies.
Published in
Intersecting impact of CAG repeat and huntingtin knockout in stem cell-derived cortical neurons
Stocksdale JT, Leventhal MJ, Lam S et al. · Neurobiology of disease 2025 · PMID 40258535 · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.106914
This dataset
Open GSE282626 in finder → Find more human ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE282626_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1189496 and SRA study SRP547002. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗ Paper (PMID 40258535) ↗
Study design
75 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 75 sample titles: 75 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 35 more — browse all 75 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.