← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Sex-specific Concordance of Striatal Transcriptional Signatures of Opioid Addiction in Human and Rodent Brains

GSE289002 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 251 samples Submitted 2025/02/21 Platform GPL24247Platform GPL25947
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 251 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
251 samples: 189 × LR_SN vs 32 × NAc vs 30 × PFCGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Sex-Specific Concordance of Striatal Transcriptional Signatures of Opioid Addiction in Human and Rodent BrainsBiological psychiatry global open science · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) has emerged as a severe, ongoing public health emergency. Current treatments for OUD are unsuccessful in lead to lasting abstinence in most users. This underscores the lasting effects of chronic opioid use and emphasizes the need to understand the molecular mechanisms of drug seeking and taking, but also how those alterations persist through acute and protracted withdrawal.
Read the full summary ↓
Methods: Here, we used RNA sequencing in post-mortem human tissue from males (n=10) and females (n=10) with OUD and age and sex-matched control subjects. We compared molecular alterations associated with human OUD in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) to mouse and rat models of non-volitional (n=3-6 per group per sex) and volitional (n=5-6 per group per sex) exposure to opioids across distinct stages of opioid use and withdrawal (acute and prolonged). Results: We found that the molecular signature in the NAc of females with OUD mirrored effects seen in the NAc of female rodents in a non-volitional paradigm at all stages of exposure. Conversely, males with OUD showed a similar expression profile to rodents with volitional exposure, but only during the acute withdrawal phase. Shared co-expression networks were involved in post-transcriptional modification of RNA and epigenetic modification of chromatin state. Conclusions: Our results provide fundamental insight into the conserved molecular pathways altered by opioids across species, with evidence suggesting that alterations in females with OUD may be driven by drug exposure, while alterations in males with OUD may be driven by volitional intake.
Published in
Sex-Specific Concordance of Striatal Transcriptional Signatures of Opioid Addiction in Human and Rodent Brains
Shelton MA, Horan N, Xue X et al. · Biological psychiatry global open science 2025 · PMID 40248277 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100476
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE289002_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1220591 and SRA study SRP562181. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
189 × LR_SN vs 32 × NAc vs 30 × PFC

Supports a between-group comparison across 251 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 251 sample titles; they account for 251 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 211 more — browse all 251 samples with per-sample file links →

Popular RNA-seq datasets

No close match found for this topic, so these are simply the most-viewed datasets of the same kind.

Search all RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.