← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Plaque-induced transcriptional reprogramming of microglia towards lymphoid receptor expression protects against Alzheimer’s disease

GSE296641 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 11 samples Submitted 2025/08/07 Platform GPL34290
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 11 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
11 samples: 3 × PU knockdown vs 3 × PU overexpression vs 3 × control vs 2 × control T cellsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Lymphoid gene expression supports neuroprotective microglia functionNature · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Microglia, the innate immune cells of the brain, play a defining role in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The microglial response to amyloid plaques can be either neuroprotective or neurotoxic. Here we show that the protective function of microglia is associated with and functionally linked to a transcriptional shift toward lymphoid gene expression.
Read the full summary ↓
Microglial contact with the plaques induces downregulation of PU.1, a lineage-specifying transcription factor. PU.1 downregulation plays a key role in mitigating the severity of AD, as evidenced by a reduction in neurotoxic microglia activation, preservation of neuronal connections, maintenance of cognitive function, and increased survival in mice with genetically reduced PU.1 expression in microglia. The neuroprotective effect of PU.1 downregulation is linked to the de-repression of lymphoid-specific proteins, particularly CD28—a surface protein critical for T cell activation. Microglia-specific deficiency in CD28, which is expressed exclusively in a small subset of plaque-associated PU.1low microglia, promotes an inflammatory microglial state and associated increase in amyloid plaque load. Our findings suggest that PU.1low lymphoid/CD28-expressing microglia that emerge in response to AD pathology exert a suppressive, anti-inflammatory effect during AD. This novel role of CD28 -and potentially other lymphoid co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory receptor proteins- in governing microglia responses in AD points to possible new immunotherapy approaches for AD treatment.
Published in
Lymphoid gene expression supports neuroprotective microglia function
Ayata P, Crowley JM, Challman MF et al. · Nature 2025 · PMID 41193812 · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09662-z
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE296641_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1260427 and SRA study SRP583839. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × PU knockdown vs 3 × PU overexpression vs 3 × control vs 2 × control T cells

Supports a case/control comparison: 6 samples read as cases, 5 as controls.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 11 sample titles; they account for 11 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.