← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Mouse Offspring Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization Exhibit Accelerated Reproductive Aging Through Early Ovarian Failure

GSE307881 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 151 samples Submitted 2026/01/29 Platform GPL32159
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 151 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
151 samples: 40 × RNA library from 12 weeks IVF single oocyte vs 36 × RNA library from 12 weeks Natural single oocyte vs 5 × RNA library from 12 weeks IVF cumulus cells vs 5 × RNA library from 12 weeks Natural cumulus cellsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
In Vitro Fertilization Accelerates Female Reproductive Aging Through Early Ovarian FailurebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an assisted reproductive technology that has enabled millions of births. Although considered safe, emerging evidence suggests that IVF may have long-term health adverse outcomes in offspring, though its impact on female reproduction, especially on reproductive aging is largely unknown. Here, we use a mouse model to investigate how IVF influences female reproductive and transgenerational health outcomes.
Read the full summary ↓
We assessed IVF-conceived fetal (E18.5) and adult (12-week and 39-week) female offspring, identifying alterations in ovarian-to-body weight ratios, ovarian morphology, serum sex hormone levels, and transcriptomic and DNA methylation profiles in ovaries, oocytes, and cumulus cells, consistent with biomarkers of accelerated reproductive aging. The offspring of IVF females and wild-type males exhibited altered fetal-to-placental weight ratios, placental morphology, and dysregulated placental gene expression. At 12-weeks-of-age, offspring showed increased body weight, disrupted lipid and glucose metabolism, and transcriptomic and epigenetic changes in liver and reproductive organs. Our results highlight the need for deeper mechanistic understanding of assisted reproduction’s long-term and multigenerational impacts on female reproductive health.
Published in
In Vitro Fertilization Accelerates Female Reproductive Aging Through Early Ovarian Failure
Rhon-Calderon EA, Hemphill CN, Savage AJ et al. · bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025 · PMID 41278955 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.13.682153
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE307881_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1327674 and SRA study SRP619562. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
40 × RNA library from 12 weeks IVF single oocyte vs 36 × RNA library from 12 weeks Natural single oocyte vs 5 × RNA library from 12 weeks IVF cumulus cells vs 5 × RNA library from 12 weeks Natural cumulus cells

Supports a between-group comparison across 86 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 151 sample titles; they account for 86 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 111 more — browse all 151 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.