← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Poising and connectivity of emergent human developmental enhancers in the transition from naive to primed pluripotency - RNA-seq

GSE309123 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 9 samples Submitted 2026/06/08 Platform GPL34295
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 9 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
9 samples: 3 × DMSO_Day5 vs 3 × UNC_Day5 vs 2 × PROTAC_Day5Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Poising and connectivity of emergent human developmental enhancers in the transition from naive to primed pluripotencyCell reports · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
In primed human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) resembling post-implantation epiblast, numerous lineage-specific enhancers assume the poised chromatin state, co-marked by H3K4me1 and Polycomb-associated H3K27me3 histone modifications. In contrast, these poised enhancers (PEs) are scarce in naive hPSCs that model pre-implantation epiblast.
Read the full summary ↓
PEs form abundant chromosomal contacts with developmental genes, but when these contacts emerge, how their formation relates to enhancer poising and their functional significance remains incompletely understood. Here, we devise high-resolution, PE-targeted Capture Hi-C to generate a comprehensive atlas of PE chromosomal contacts in the time course of hPSC transition from the naive to primed state. We find that enhancer poising emerges early in the transition, while the contacts show diverse dynamics that is only partially coupled to poising. PROTAC-induced degradation of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) early in the transition weakens PE connectivity, while inhibition of its H3K27 methyltransferase activity does not, suggesting a non-catalytic role of Polycomb in supporting PE contacts. Notably, PE contacts persist after developmental activation or ectopic CRISPRa targeting and can mediate long-range gene induction. Together, these findings reveal the temporal and mechanistic principles of PE connectivity, highlighting a potential role of PE contacts in establishing gene expression patterns in human development.
Published in
Poising and connectivity of emergent human developmental enhancers in the transition from naive to primed pluripotency
Nocente MC, Della Rosa M, Malcolm AA et al. · Cell reports 2026 · PMID 42250221 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117402
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE309123_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1334002 and SRA study SRP626451. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × DMSO_Day5 vs 3 × UNC_Day5 vs 2 × PROTAC_Day5

Supports a between-group comparison across 8 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 9 sample titles; they account for 8 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.