← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Rational cell fate engineering through chromatin dynamics [ATAC-Seq]

GSE243513 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 20 samples Submitted 2024/06/24 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 20 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
20 samples: 8 × Nanog+Oct4, Day vs 8 × NanogN70+Oct4, Day vs 3 × ESCGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Engineering mouse cell fate controller by rational designNature communications · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Mechanism controlling cell fate remains elusive. Chromatin remodeling complex interacts with transcription factors to colocalize across the genome and regulate region-specific epigenetic environment. Here, we propose an engineering approach for controlling cell fate through chromatin closing and opening. We utilize chromatin remodeling complex, BAF, known to activate gene expression by opening chromatin loci.
Read the full summary ↓
By grafting BAF interacting motifs onto Nanog, we show that engineering factors could promote somatic cell reprogramming with Oct4. Furthermore, mutation on the interacting motifs render iPSC generation. The syntactic factors facilitate cell fate transition by recruiting BAF complex to modulate chromatin accessibility and reorganize cell state specific enhancers. Our findings reveal alternative methods to control cell fate by manipulating chromatin accessibility.
Published in
Engineering mouse cell fate controller by rational design
Huang T, Liu D, Wang X et al. · Nature communications 2024 · PMID 39043686 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50551-2
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE243513_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1018833 and SRA study SRP461617. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
8 × Nanog+Oct4, Day vs 8 × NanogN70+Oct4, Day vs 3 × ESC

Supports a between-group comparison across 19 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 20 sample titles; they account for 19 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.