← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Desipramine Induces Anti-inflammatory Dorsal Root Ganglion Transcriptional Signatures in the Murine Spared Nerve Injury Model

GSE261676 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 16 samples Submitted 2024/04/03 Platform GPL13112
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 16 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
16 samples: 16 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Desipramine induces anti-inflammatory dorsal root ganglion transcriptional signatures in the murine spared nerve injury modelNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Monoamine-targeting antidepressants serve as frontline medications for chronic pain and associated comorbidities. While persistent anti-allodynic properties of antidepressants generally require weeks of treatment, several groups have demonstrated acute analgesic effects within hours of administration, suggesting a role in non-mesocorticolimbic pain processing regions such as the peripheral nervous system.
Read the full summary ↓
To further explore this possibility, after four weeks of spared nerve injury or sham surgeries, we systemically administered desipramine or saline for an additional three weeks and performed whole transcriptome RNA sequencing on injured dorsal root ganglia. Along with alterations in molecular pathways associated with neuronal activity, we observed a robust immunomodulatory transcriptional signature in the desipramine treated group. Cell subtype deconvolution predicted that these changes were associated with A- and C-fibers. Of note, differentially expressed genes from the dorsal root ganglia of DMI-treated, injured mice were largely unique compared to those from the nucleus accumbens of the same animals. These observations suggest that, under peripheral nerve injury conditions, desipramine induces specific gene expression changes across various regions of the nociceptive circuitry.
Published in
Desipramine induces anti-inflammatory dorsal root ganglion transcriptional signatures in the murine spared nerve injury model
Serafini RA, Ramakrishnan A, Shen L et al. · Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.) 2024 · PMID 38549875 · doi:10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100153
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE261676_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1088405 and SRA study SRP495417. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
16 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 16 sample titles: 16 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.