← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Glucocorticoid-dependence and independence of the circadian liver transcriptome

GSE280339 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 52 samples Submitted 2026/01/09 Platform GPL21103
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 52 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
52 samples: 51 distinct titles, 1 of them repeatedGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Glucocorticoid-dependence and independence of the circadian liver transcriptomeNpj biological timing and sleep · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
The liver, a critical metabolic organ, shows clear day-night variation in patterns of gene and protein expression, and in metabolic pathway activity. Liver cells possess molecular circadian clocks, but systemic factors also contribute to the circadian rhythmicity of liver gene expression. Here, we examine the role of glucocorticoid signalling.
Read the full summary ↓
Glucocorticoids are essential hormones, with a strong circadian oscillation, which control multiple cellular processes via their action on the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). We first compare clock factor and GR binding at promoters and enhancers linked to rhythmic genes, and find increased clock factor binding at those elements where GR is also present. We find that genes with GR binding at the promoter are more likely to show rhythmic expression. We go to test the role of GR more directly, by examining circadian rhythms of gene expression in mice with and without hepatocyte-targeted GR deletion. Notably, we observe only a small effect of GR deletion, with the vast majority of rhythmic genes showing unchanged rhythmic expression, despite evidence for GR binding in the vicinity of these genes. We do find a small number of genes to show lost or gained rhythmicity with GR deletion, and genes which lose rhythmicity do associate with GR binding sites. However, GR appears redundant for conveying timing information to most of the rhythmic liver transcriptome, a conclusion which is supported by our re-analysis of an independent published dataset.
Published in
Glucocorticoid-dependence and independence of the circadian liver transcriptome
Maidstone RJ, Hunter AL, Iqbal M et al. · Npj biological timing and sleep 2026 · PMID 41641009 · doi:10.1038/s44323-025-00068-8
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE280339_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1177879 and SRA study SRP540886. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
51 distinct titles, 1 of them repeated
HET 48 M ×2

How we read this: Read from 52 sample titles: 51 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 12 more — browse all 52 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.