← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Nanoplastics induces Arrhythmia in Human Stem-cells derived Cardiomyocytes [mouse hearts]

GSE293469 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 21 samples Submitted 2026/04/05 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 21 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
21 samples: 21 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Nanoplastics induces arrhythmia in human stem-cells derived cardiomyocytesEcotoxicology and environmental safety · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Nanoplastics (NPs), plastic particles ranging from 1–1000 nm, form through weathering and are considered more hazardous than larger plastics due to their ability to penetrate cell barriers and be internalised by biological systems. Most research on NPs has focused on animal models, examining effects on the brain, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract.
Read the full summary ↓
To enhance physiological relevance, this study investigated the impact of NPs on human cardiomyocytes (CMs) derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). We observed significantly higher cellular uptake of 50 nm NPs compared to 500 nm particles, with dose-dependent accumulation over 3, 5, and 7 days of treatment. This accumulation induced oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, culminating in arrhythmias by day 7. Complementing these in vitro findings, transcriptome profiling of mice exposed to NPs for 8 weeks revealed disrupted RNA splicing, dysregulated protein translation, and defective protein folding. These molecular changes led to ER stress, apoptosis, and impaired transmembrane ion conductance, contributing to the arrhythmic phenotype. Our findings highlight the detrimental effects of NPs on the human heart. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying NP-induced toxicity and to develop strategies for mitigating their adverse effects. This study underscores the urgency of addressing NP pollution to protect human health.
Published in
Nanoplastics induces arrhythmia in human stem-cells derived cardiomyocytes
Chia SPS, Pang JKS, Winanto W et al. · Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 2025 · PMID 39756176 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117657
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE293469_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1244753 and SRA study SRP575699. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
21 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Supports a case/control comparison: 12 samples read as cases, 9 as controls.

How we read this: Read from 21 sample titles: 21 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.