← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Spatial biology reveals macrophage dysfunction in immunosuppressed non-melanoma skin cancer [spatial_ATAC]

GSE306129 Homo sapiens (human) Other 28 samples Submitted 2026/08/07 Platform GPL34284Platform GPL24676
At a glance

human · 28 samples

Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
28 samples: 28 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI.
Paper
Spatial biology reveals altered macrophage states in immunosuppressed non-melanoma skin cancerCell · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
The rising incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), particularly among immunosuppressed individuals, underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) to develop effective and safe immunotherapies. This study employed single-cell multi-omic analyses to investigate the spatial distribution and transcriptional profiles of immune cells in NMSC from both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients.
Read the full summary ↓
Our results challenge the prevailing notion that immunosuppression is primarily driven by reduced immune cell abundance or lymphocytic dysfunction. Instead, we identified a critical deficiency in antigen presentation by macrophages, leading to impaired T-cell diversity and clonal expansion. Additionally, a spatial epigenomic atlas of the NMSC TME revealed distinct spatial niches and epigenetic programs associated with immunosuppression. These findings highlight the central role of innate immunity in shaping anti-tumor responses and offer potential therapeutic targets to enhance immunotherapy in this vulnerable patient population.
Published in
Spatial biology reveals altered macrophage states in immunosuppressed non-melanoma skin cancer
Naara S, Kochat V, Rao X et al. · Cell 2026 · PMID 42556334 · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.07.031
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need.

All supplementary files ↗
3 · The original raw files

Whole study · RAW.tar

Everything the authors deposited as one archive (GSE306129_RAW.tar), including the raw array or instrument files. Can be large; the picker in step 2 takes just the samples you need.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1309491. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
28 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 28 sample titles: 28 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.