← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Localized FLASH Radiotherapy Reduces Long-Term Skin and Muscle Damage While Preserving Systemic Homeostasis

GSE307570 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 20 samples Submitted 2025/09/15 Platform GPL34290
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 20 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
20 samples: 6 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone treatment for nearly 50% of cancer patients, yet its efficacy remains limited by cumulative damage to healthy tissues over time. Delivering RT at ultra-high dose rates (FLASH-RT) represents a transformative strategy, as it appears to maintain tumor control, while sparing the surrounding normal tissue—a phenomenon termed FLASH effect.
Read the full summary ↓
Here, we compared electron FLASH-RT and conventional RT (CONV-RT) on skin and muscle tissue of naïve mice assessing tissue integrity and gene expression. Bulk RNA sequencing revealed striking differences: FLASH induced minimal transcriptional disruption in skin and muscle, whereas CONV-RT triggered thousands of differentially expressed genes, including massive activation of fibrosis, inflammation, cell death-related pathways in skin, and broad dysregulation of genes linked to muscle function, remodeling and the unfolded protein response. Histological and ultrastructural analyses corroborated the findings, showing reduced immune infiltration in the skin and preserved tissue architecture both in skin and muscle following FLASH. In conclusion our study not only confirms the protective nature of FLASH but also provides novel mechanistic insights into the cascade linking local injury to systemic dysfunction under CONV-RT, reinforcing the translational potential of FLASH to expand the therapeutic window of radiotherapy.
This dataset
Open GSE307570 in finder → Find more mouse RNA-seq datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE307570_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1322311 and SRA study SRP618681. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗
Study design
6 conditions, mostly in triplicate
Skin, 70 days post 35 Gy FLASH irradiation, ×4 Muscle, 70 days post 35 Gy FLASH irradiation, ×4 Skin, 70 days not irradiated, ×3 Skin, 70 days post 35 Gy CONV irradiation, ×3 Muscle, 70 days not irradiated, ×3 Muscle, 70 days post 35 Gy CONV irradiation, ×3

Supports a between-group comparison across 20 samples.

How we read this: 6 replicated groups read from 20 sample titles; they account for 20 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.