← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

MicroRNA210 regulated brain pericyte dysfunction exacerbates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal mice

GSE312452 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 15 samples Submitted 2026/01/14 Platform GPL28457
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 15 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
15 samples: 10 distinct titles, 2 of them repeatedGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
MicroRNA210 regulated brain pericyte dysfunction exacerbates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal miceFluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Background While the role of pericytes in blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption and neuroinflammation is well-established in adult neurological disorders, their contribution to neonatal brain injury is largely unexplored. Here, we investigated the role of brain pericytes in hypoxic-ischemic (HI) brain injury in the developing brain, with a particular focus on the regulatory role of pericyte-derived microRNA210 (miR210) in pericyte dysfunction.
Read the full summary ↓
Methods HI brain injury was induced on postnatal day 9 transgenic mice, including Atp13a5-tdTomato brain pericyte reporter mice, pericyte-specific diphtheria toxin receptor mice, miR210 knockout mice, and wild-type controls. Post-injury assessments include brain infarct, brain edema, BBB permeability, ELISA, western blotting, immunostaining, and neurological function test. BBB-associated cells, including pericytes and endothelial cells, were isolated from mouse brain using an immunomagnetic approach. RNA sequencing analysis was conducted to examine transcriptomic changes in pericytes after HI. To investigate the regulatory role of miR210 in pericyte dysfunction and its underlying mechanisms, primary pericytes were transfected with miR210 mimic or negative control, followed by oxygen-glucose deprivation. Transfected cells were also treated with either interleukin 1 type 1 receptor neutralizing antibody or recombinant interleukin 1 type 2 receptor chimera protein. Post-assays included RT-qPCR, immunostaining and cell viability assay. Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test was used, as appropriate. Results HI resulted in a time-dependent loss of pericytes in pericyte reporter mouse pups. Ablation of brain pericytes exacerbated BBB disruption and HI brain injury in neonatal brain. miR210 deletion mitigated brain pericyte loss and BBB leakage post-HI. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that HI-induced pericyte dysfunction was associated with upregulated genes enriched in biological processes such as “cellular response to interleukin 1”. miR210 knockout suppressed the expression of proinflammatory markers such as Il1r1. Mechanistically, miR210 overexpression increased proinflammatory cytokine levels and promoted pericyte cell death under oxygen-glucose deprivation, effects that were reversed by IL1R1 blockade. Importantly, brain pericyte-specific miR210 deletion preserved pericyte viability and BBB integrity, and provided neuroprotection after HI. Conclusions These findings underscore the critical role of brain pericytes in BBB function in the developing brain and identify miR210 as a central regulator of pericyte dysfunction following neonatal HI brain injury.
Published in
MicroRNA210 regulated brain pericyte dysfunction exacerbates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal mice
Hu S, Lopez-Robles Y, Liu E et al. · Fluids and barriers of the CNS 2026 · PMID 41507940 · doi:10.1186/s12987-025-00755-5
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE312452_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1373341 and SRA study SRP651198. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
10 distinct titles, 2 of them repeated
KO-Sham ×4 WT-Sham ×3

How we read this: Read from 15 sample titles: 10 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.