← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Tissue nanotransfection-mediated induction of neurogenic programs promotes myoprotective responses in denervated skeletal muscle

GSE334940 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 15 samples Submitted 2026/08/07 Platform GPL34290
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 15 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
15 samples: 5 × Control vs 5 × Sham vs 5 × ABMGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Peripheral nerve injuries often result in prolonged skeletal muscle denervation, leading to progressive atrophy, fibrosis, neuromuscular instability, and loss of regenerative capacity before axons can reinnervate distal targets. Here, we developed a non-viral strategy using tissue nanotransfection (TNT) to deliver the neurogenic transcription factor cocktail Ascl1, Brn2, and Myt1l (ABM) directly to denervated skeletal muscle.
Read the full summary ↓
In vitro, ABM-transfected myoblasts sustained expression of the reprogramming factors, acquired neuron-like morphologies, and upregulated neuronal markers including Tuj1, Map2, and Syp. RNA sequencing confirmed broad activation of neurogenic transcriptional programs, with enrichment of pathways associated with neuronal fate commitment, neuron differentiation, axon guidance, synaptogenesis, and developmental signaling. In a mouse model of sciatic nerve resection, TNT enabled localized ABM expression in denervated gastrocnemius muscle. ABM-TNT treatment accelerated resolution of denervation-associated fibrillation potentials and showed trends toward improved twitch and tetanic torque, compound muscle action potential amplitudes, and muscle mass preservation. Transcriptomic profiling of treated muscles 5 weeks after injury revealed distinct gene expression programs enriched for muscle regeneration, neuromuscular organization, trophic support, extracellular matrix remodeling, angiogenesis, myogenesis, and metabolic adaptation. Network analyses further identified activation of neurogenic regulators, neurotrophic signaling, and vascular-support pathways. These findings establish TNT-mediated ABM delivery as a non-viral platform for inducing neurogenic and myoprotective programs in denervated muscle and suggest a strategy to preserve muscle viability during the prolonged interval required for peripheral nerve regeneration.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE334940_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1476954 and SRA study SRP708378. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
5 × Control vs 5 × Sham vs 5 × ABM

Supports a between-group comparison across 15 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 15 sample titles; they account for 15 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.