← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Base editing restores CDKL5 expression and rescues neuronal deficits in a patient-derived model of CDKL5 deficiency disorder

GSE325168 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 18 samples Submitted 2026/03/27 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 18 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
18 samples: 6 × iPSC-induced neuron, isogenic Control, Day28, vs 6 × iPSC-induced neuron, CDKL5-R550*, Day28, vs 6 × iPSC-induced neuron, ABE-corrected, Day28,Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Base editing restores CDKL5 expression and rescues neuronal deficits in a patient-derived model of CDKL5 deficiency disorderScientific reports · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
CDKL5 (Cyclin-dependent kinase like 5) deficiency disorder (CDD) is a rare monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder caused by pathogenic mutations in the CDKL5 gene, with approximately 50% of reported variants being point mutations. Base editing presents a promising therapeutic strategy to correct such mutations, restore endogenous CDKL5 expression, and pave the way for novel treatments for CDD.
Read the full summary ↓
To assess the therapeutic potential of base editing for CDD, we applied adenine base editing (ABE) to correct a CDKL5-R550* (c.1648C>T) mutation in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from a CDD patient. Isogenic control, CDKL5-R550* mutant, and ABE-corrected iPSCs were differentiated into neurons and the restoration of CDKL5-related and functional recovery were assessed. In this study, we demonstrated that ABE successfully restored CDKL5 protein levels and CDKL5-dependent signalling pathways in edited iPSC-differentiated neurons to levels comparable to the isogenic control. Morphological deficits, and genes expression were normalized in the ABE-corrected neurons. This study provides evidence that ABE can precisely correct pathogenic mutation and functionally rescue some CDD-associated neuronal phenotypes in patient-derived cells, supporting its potential as a valuable gene therapy for CDD. Moreover, these findings underscore the broader applicability of base editing for treating other monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders caused by point mutations.
Published in
Base editing restores CDKL5 expression and rescues neuronal deficits in a patient-derived model of CDKL5 deficiency disorder
Chai Y, Zhu Y, Zhu J et al. · Scientific reports 2026 · PMID 41963441 · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-48097-y
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE325168_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1438745 and SRA study SRP684568. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 × iPSC-induced neuron, isogenic Control, Day28, vs 6 × iPSC-induced neuron, CDKL5-R550*, Day28, vs 6 × iPSC-induced neuron, ABE-corrected, Day28,

Supports a between-group comparison across 18 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 18 sample titles; they account for 18 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.