Target landscape
Open Targets · retrieved 2026-09-12 · weekly12 genes recurrently implicated in esophageal cancer, triaged for whether anything can actually be aimed at them. The zeros are the informative rows.
Of 12 recurrently implicated genes, 9 carry any drug at all. That is a statement about these 12 gene targets, not about the disease: Esophageal cancer does have labelled therapy — 11 drugs, listed in the next section.
Two different questions
The table below asks what can be aimed at 12 recurrently implicated genes. That is narrower than what is approved for the disease, and narrower again than what esophageal cancer is actually treated with, which includes agents approved under broader indications. All three are on this page and they are kept apart deliberately.
| Gene | Drugs | Approval, and whether it reached this disease | Open Targets tractabilitycomputed from protein features and literature — a signal that a modality is worth trying, not evidence that it works | Cell therapy here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP53 across cancers → | 8 | Phase 3Alrizomadlin, Cenersen, Contusugene Ladenovec, Eprenetapopt, Idasanutlin, Navtemadlin, Siremadlin, Teprasiran2 trials, none active | other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| ERBB2 across cancers → | 45 | 17 approvedAfatinib, Afatinib Dimaleate, Dacomitinib, Lapatinib, Lapatinib Ditosylate, Margetuximab, Masoprocol, Neratinib, Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan, Trastuzumab Duocarmazine, Trastuzumab Emtansine, Tucatinib, Vandetanib, Zanidatamab, ZenocutuzumabApproved in esophageal cancer: Trastuzumab, Zanidatamab.55 active of 136 esophageal cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| CD274 across cancers → | 13 | 5 approvedAtezolizumab, Avelumab, Cosibelimab, Durvalumab, SugemalimabApproved in esophageal cancer: Durvalumab.56 active of 105 esophageal cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| PDCD1 across cancers → | 26 | 9 approvedCemiplimab, Dostarlimab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Retifanlimab, Serplulimab, Sintilimab, Tislelizumab, ToripalimabApproved in esophageal cancer: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Tislelizumab.228 active of 457 esophageal cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | 1 active of 6 trials |
| CDKN2A across cancers → | 0 | No drug— | — | — |
| NFE2L2 | 2 | 1 approvedOmaveloxoloneNo esophageal cancer trial of any of these drugs | antibody, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| SOX2 | 0 | No drug— | protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| EGFR across cancers → | 74 | 23 approvedAfatinib, Afatinib Dimaleate, Amivantamab, Aumolertinib, Brigatinib, Cetuximab, Cetuximab Sarotalocan, Dacomitinib, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Icotinib, Lapatinib, Lapatinib Ditosylate, Lazertinib, Mobocertinib, Necitumumab, Neratinib, Nimotuzumab, Olmutinib, Osimertinib, Panitumumab, Rociletinib, VandetanibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, malignant tumor of neck and 14 other indications. No esophageal cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.27 active of 168 esophageal cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| CCND1 | 2 | 1 approvedPalbociclibApproved in breast cancer, breast carcinoma, breast neoplasm. No esophageal cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.5 active of 6 esophageal cancer trials | protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| KRAS across cancers → | 3 | 2 approvedAdagrasib, SotorasibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma. No esophageal cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.No esophageal cancer trial of any of these drugs | antibody, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| SMAD4 across cancers → | 0 | No drug— | protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| CLDN18 across cancers → | 1 | 1 approvedZolbetuximabApproved in esophageal cancer: Zolbetuximab.5 active of 7 esophageal cancer trials | antibody | 1 active of 1 trial |
Dataset evidence counts studies in the 428-study ranked set whose title or abstract names the gene; the bar is scaled to EGFR. Sources: Open Targets Platform and NCBI GEO, retrieved 2026-09-12. Clinical stage is the highest reached for any indication — see the per-drug indications noted in each row. Target-prioritisation reference only; not clinical or prescribing guidance.
What is actually approved here
openFDA drug labels · weekly11 drugs carry an FDA label naming esophageal cancer: Durvalumab, Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-Nxki, Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Porfimer, Tislelizumab, Trastuzumab, Trifluridine And Tipiracil, Zanidatamab, Zolbetuximab. Separately, 45 of the drugs returned for the genes in the table above are approved only for other diseases and reach esophageal cancer through trials, not through their labels.
Every label that names esophageal cancer
| Drug | Role | What the label says |
|---|---|---|
| DurvalumabIMFINZI | Labelled here | in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, followed by single agent IMFINZI, for the treatment of adult patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). |
| Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-NxkiEnhertu | Labelled here | HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH positive) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have received a prior trastuzumab-based regimen. |
| IpilimumabYERVOY | Labelled here | Esophageal Cancer • Treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, as first line treatment in combination with nivolumab whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1). |
| NivolumabOPDIVO, OPDIVO QVANTIG | Labelled here | Esophageal Cancer • adult patients with completely resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer with residual pathologic disease, who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). |
| PembrolizumabKEYTRUDA, KEYTRUDA QLEX | Labelled here | Esophageal Cancer KEYTRUDA QLEX is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) (tumors with epicenter 1 to 5 centimeters above the GEJ) carcinoma that is not amenable to surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation either: in combination with platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for patients with... |
| PorfimerPhotofrin | Labelled here | Esophageal Cancer PHOTOFRIN ® is indicated for the palliation of patients with completely obstructing esophageal cancer, or of patients with partially obstructing esophageal cancer who, in the opinion of their healthcare provider, cannot be satisfactorily treated with Nd:YAG laser therapy. |
| TislelizumabTEVIMBRA | Labelled here | Esophageal Cancer First-Line Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma TEVIMBRA, in combination with platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1). |
| TrastuzumabHERZUMA, Herceptin, Kanjinti | Labelled here | ( 1.1 , 1.2 ) The treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. |
| Trifluridine And TipiracilLONSURF | Labelled here | metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma previously treated with at least two prior lines of chemotherapy that included a fluoropyrimidine, a platinum, either a taxane or irinotecan, and if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy. |
| ZanidatamabZIIHERA | Labelled here | Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (GEA) • ZIIHERA, in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy and tislelizumab-jsgr, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+) unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal adenocarcinoma, as detected by an FDA-authorized test... |
| ZolbetuximabVYLOY | Labelled here | VYLOY, in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‑negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors are claudin (CLDN) 18.2 positive as determined by an FDA-approved test [see Dosage an... |
| CapecitabineCAPECITABINE, Capecitabine, XELODA | Backbone | Gastric, Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal junction cancer as a component of a combination chemotherapy regimen. |
| DocetaxelBEIZRAY, DOCETAXEL, DOCIVYX | Backbone | Gastric Adenocarcinoma (GC): with cisplatin and fluorouracil for untreated, advanced GC, including the gastroesophageal junction |
100 labels match indications_and_usage:"esophageal cancer" OR indications_and_usage:"esophageal carcinoma" OR indications_and_usage:"esophageal squamous" OR indications_and_usage:"esophageal adenocarcinoma" OR indications_and_usage:"gastroesophageal junction"; they collapse to 13 distinct molecules once salt forms, biosimilars and co-formulated hyaluronidase are merged. Source: openFDA drug label API (api.fda.gov/drug/label.json), retrieved 2026-09-12. Labels change; this reflects the current label text, not the approval history. Not prescribing guidance.
Cell therapy against PD-1
ClinicalTrials.gov · retrieved 2026-09-12 · weeklyPD-1 is the busiest cell-therapy antigen in esophageal cancer: 6 registered trials, 1 still active, 1 withdrawn before enrolling anyone. It has no gene entry of its own and is reached through PDCD1: the checkpoint receptor PDCD1 encodes, on the T cell.
| Trial | Phase | Status | Title | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT07410676 | 1/2 | Recruiting | EBNK-001 Allogeneic NK Cells With Low-Dose IL-15 ± Pembrolizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors | 2026-02-18 |
| NCT03706326 | 1/2 | Unknown | CAR T and PD-1 Knockout Engineered T Cells for Esophageal Cancer | 2018-10-16 |
| NCT03081715 | no phase | Completed | PD-1 Knockout Engineered T Cells for Advanced Esophageal Cancer | 2019-06-12 |
| NCT03697824 | 2 | Withdrawn | Clinical Trial of Safety, Tolerability and Antitumor Activity of Genetically Engineered T Cells in Combination With Anti-Cancer Agents in Relapsed and Refractory Synovial Sarcoma Expressing New York Esophageal Antigen-1 (NY-ESO-1) and/or LAGE-1a | 2019-10-29 |
| NCT02757391 | 1 | Terminated | CD8+ T Cell Therapy and Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tumors | 2020-10-30 |
| NCT03709706 | 1/2 | Terminated | Pilot Immunotherapy Study With Letetresgene Autoleucel (Lete-cel, GSK3377794)T-cells in New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1)/ LAGE-1a-positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Either Alone or in Combination With Pembrolizumab | 2024-02-23 |
6 of 6 shown, most recently active first. Other antigens searched: CLDN18.2 (1). Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, retrieved 2026-09-12. Trials are matched on the antigen named in the title or intervention, so a trial stating only a product code is missed.
Research momentum
PubMed MeSH · monthlyEvery term below is a share of the esophageal cancer literature, not a count, because the field itself grew: 2015–2018 (n=6,000) against 2021–2025 (n=6,000). A topic whose papers doubled while the field doubled has not risen.
These are sample shares. The two windows hold 7,838 and 11,973 papers; MeSH terms were read from an evenly spaced sample of 6,000 and 6,000 of them, taken across the whole window rather than from its most recent papers. Percentages carry sampling error of roughly a percentage point and small differences between two terms are not meaningful.
Rising, with a real baseline
| MeSH term | 2015–18 | 2021–25 | Change | Share now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machine Learning | 0.08% | 1.03% | 12.39× | 62 papers |
| Immunotherapy | 0.5% | 4.47% | 8.93× | 268 papers |
| RNA, Circular | 0.13% | 0.9% | 6.75× | 54 papers |
| Tumor Microenvironment | 0.73% | 4.68% | 6.39× | 281 papers |
| Robotics | 0.08% | 0.53% | 6.39× | 32 papers |
| Progression-Free Survival | 0.22% | 1.37% | 6.31× | 82 papers |
| Circulating Tumor DNA | 0.08% | 0.47% | 5.59× | 28 papers |
| Nomograms | 0.3% | 1.67% | 5.55× | 100 papers |
| B7-H1 Antigen | 0.45% | 2.17% | 4.81× | 130 papers |
| Molecular Docking Simulation | 0.1% | 0.47% | 4.66× | 28 papers |
Cooling
| MeSH term | 2015–18 | 2021–25 | Change | Share now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multivariate Analysis | 3.48% | 0.23% | 0.07× | 14 papers |
| Survival Analysis | 5.85% | 0.72% | 0.12× | 43 papers |
| Immunohistochemistry | 4.85% | 0.73% | 0.15× | 44 papers |
| Tumor Cells, Cultured | 1.48% | 0.23% | 0.16× | 14 papers |
| Taxoids | 1.75% | 0.28% | 0.16× | 17 papers |
| RNA, Small Interfering | 1.47% | 0.23% | 0.16× | 14 papers |
Biggest topics now
| MeSH term | 2015–18 | 2021–25 | Change | Share now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma | 24.93% | 37.73% | 1.51× | 2264 papers |
| Esophagectomy | 24.93% | 23.9% | 0.96× | 1434 papers |
| Prognosis | 20.8% | 18.85% | 0.91× | 1131 papers |
| Adenocarcinoma | 24.75% | 14.97% | 0.6× | 898 papers |
| Treatment Outcome | 17.83% | 14.43% | 0.81× | 866 papers |
| Neoadjuvant Therapy | 9.47% | 11.77% | 1.24× | 706 papers |
| Stomach Neoplasms | 10.05% | 11.27% | 1.12× | 676 papers |
| Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic | 11.17% | 10.88% | 0.97× | 653 papers |
| Cell Proliferation | 8.93% | 10.1% | 1.13× | 606 papers |
| Carcinoma, Squamous Cell | 36.25% | 9.92% | 0.27× | 595 papers |
Publication mix
| Type | 2015–18 | 2021–25 |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Randomized Controlled Trial | 3.0% | 2.3% |
| Review | 9.2% | 6.6% |
| Meta-Analysis | 3.5% | 2.8% |
| Case Reports | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Query: Esophageal Neoplasms[MeSH Major Topic] NOT ("Esophageal Achalasia"[MeSH] OR "Eosinophilic Esophagitis"[MeSH]). Terms need at least 12 papers in the recent window and, in the rising table, at least 5 in the earlier one — a term going from 1 paper to 12 is a large fold change and no evidence of anything. Ubiquitous descriptors (Humans, Animals, age bands) and the disease’s own term are dropped. Windows are read whole where they fit and sampled where they do not; the totals and the sample sizes are both in the JSON beside this page. Source: PubMed MeSH, retrieved 2026-09-12.
Disease burden
What the public sources count, and how closely each category matches this disease. The same figures for every disease on the site are on one table.
| Measure | Value | Match | What it counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| New cases each year | 22,530 cases/year | direct | 2026 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Deaths each year | 16,290 deaths/year | direct | 2026 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Incidence rate | 4.2 cases per 100,000 people per year | direct | 2019-2023 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Death rate | 3.7 deaths per 100,000 people per year | direct | 2020-2024 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| People living with it | 55,281 people living with the disease | direct | 2023 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Median age at diagnosis | 69.0 years | direct | 2019-2023 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| median age at death | 71 years | direct | 2020-2024 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Five-year relative survival | 22.2% | direct | 2016-2022 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Esophageal Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
Years of life lost
7.3 years per case, 164,766 a year, from survival and age at diagnosis rather than from a death count. derived proxy What this costs to fund is in Funding.
3 assumptions behind this estimate
- Five-year relative survival stands in for cure; a death after five years is not counted.
- The median age at diagnosis stands in for the whole age distribution.
- Life expectancy at birth (78.4 years) is the reference, rather than remaining expectancy at the age of death from a life table.
- Each assumption moves the result by more than the difference between the two diseases currently on this site, so this figure separates a disease from one ten times its size, not from a close neighbour.
Funding
NIH RePORTER · quarterlyNIH obligations naming esophageal cancer, after removing the 1,732 records across all years that matched the search but are about something else. That filter is not cosmetic: without it this section reports another field’s funding as this disease’s.
NIH obligations by fiscal year
| Year | Obligations | Awards | Distinct projects | Dropped as off-topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2013 | $23.7M | 64 | 52 | 143 |
| FY2014 | $34.9M | 71 | 52 | 131 |
| FY2015 | $40.3M | 88 | 68 | 110 |
| FY2016 | $31.1M | 83 | 69 | 109 |
| FY2017 | $39.8M | 91 | 69 | 125 |
| FY2018 | $38.0M | 93 | 66 | 179 |
| FY2019 | $36.3M | 76 | 57 | 141 |
| FY2020 | $33.3M | 74 | 56 | 125 |
| FY2021 | $32.5M | 75 | 56 | 127 |
| FY2022 | $37.7M | 79 | 62 | 137 |
| FY2023 | $44.1M | 76 | 57 | 146 |
| FY2024 | $42.6M | 76 | 60 | 125 |
| FY2025 | $42.9M | 67 | 51 | 134 |
Where FY2025 money went
| Institution | Obligations | Awards |
|---|---|---|
| Case Western Reserve University | $6.5M | 7 |
| University Of Tx Md Anderson Can Ctr | $4.8M | 6 |
| Arizona State University-Tempe Campus | $3.6M | 2 |
| Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center | $3.4M | 5 |
| Columbia University Health Sciences | $3.2M | 4 |
| University Of Miami School Of Medicine | $2.9M | 6 |
| Division Of Cancer Epidemiology And Genetics | $2.8M | 5 |
| University Of Colorado Denver | $1.7M | 0 |
| Johns Hopkins University | $1.4M | 3 |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | $1.2M | 2 |
Text search esophageal cancer over project title, terms and abstract, per fiscal year. Awards are individual funding actions; distinct projects collapse them by core project number, so a multi-year grant counts once. The most recent year may be incomplete. Source: NIH RePORTER, retrieved 2026-09-12.
What that buys
Against 164,766 years of life lost a year, FY2025 obligations are $260 per life-year — $1,904 per case. The estimate and its assumptions are in Disease burden.
Who funds it, FY2025
The total says how much. These say who from, through what kind of award, and to whom — which a dollar figure cannot.
NIH institutes
Projects by administering institute. The rows above are the top 6 and account for 67 of 67.
Award mechanisms
R01 is an investigator-initiated grant; ZIA is NIH intramural, meaning the work happens inside NIH rather than being funded outside it. The rows above are the top 15 and account for 62 of 67.
Where it lands
Share of $42.9M in FY2025. The top three hold 35%.
Public datasets, ranked
NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite · weekly729 human GEO series match esophageal cancer. Keyword relevance cannot tell a 360-sample patient cohort from a six-well cell-line experiment, so this ranking scores four things GEO does not expose: how often the accession is named in full-text papers, field-normalised citation impact, clinical annotation, and cohort type.
Composition of the 428-study ranked set
Established
high reuse, older| Accession | Study | Samples | MentionsEurope PMC | RCR | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE53625 | LncRNA profile study reveals a three-lncRNA signature associated with the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients2014 · array | 358 | 284 | 9.8 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survival367 cites |
| GSE160269 | Dissecting esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma ecosystem by single-cell transcriptomic analysis2020 · single-cell | 128 | 137 | 14.2 | patient cohortAPT 0.75survival302 cites |
| GSE165252 | RNA sequencing of the phase II PERFECT trial combining a PD-L1 inhibitor (atezolizumab) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.2021 · sequencing | 77 | 66 | 11.0 | patient cohortAPT 0.95molecularATEZOLIZUMABPD-L1230 cites |
| GSE23400 | Global gene expression profiling and validation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)2010 · array | 208 | 226 | 4.3 | APT 0.75survival182 cites |
| GSE20347 | Analysis of gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)2011 · array | 34 | 231 | 3.4 | patient cohortAPT 0.75stage154 cites |
| GSE145370 | Immune suppressive landscape in a human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment2020 · single-cell | 28 | 46 | 15.0 | APT 0.75survivalmolecularCD274397 cites |
| GSE13898 | Robust prognostic biomarkers for EAC identified by systems-level characterization of tumor transcriptome2011 · array | 118 | 65 | 2.7 | patient cohortAPT 0.75survival124 cites |
| GSE6188 | Distinctive microRNA profiles relating to patient survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma2008 · array | 257 | 19 | 7.1 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survival298 cites |
Recent
2022 onward, by score| Accession | Study | Samples | MentionsEurope PMC | RCR | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE203115 | Intra-tumoural Microbiota Remodels the Tumour Immune2023 · single-cell | 12 | 13 | 10.6 | patient cohortAPT 0.75survivalmolecularPD-1131 cites |
| GSE174302 | Cancer specific microbiome revealed by cell-free RNA reads in patients' plasma2022 · sequencing | 230 | 16 | 4.6 | patient cohortAPT 0.7552 cites |
| GSE203067 | Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Primary and Metastatic Tumor Ecosystems in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma2025 · single-cell | 21 | 5 | 6.3 | patient cohortAPT 0.7587 cites |
| GSE221561 | Comprehensive Landscape of Resistance Mechanisms for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by single-cell Transcriptomics2023 · single-cell | 11 | 13 | 1.7 | mixedAPT 0.5survival24 cites |
| GSE222078 | The single cell transcriptional landscape of esophageal adenocarcinoma and its modulation by neoadjuvant chemotherapy2023 · sequencing | 10 | 8 | 3.1 | patient cohortAPT 0.7550 cites |
| GSE232332 | Epigenetic array data of saliva samples in individiduals with esophageal cancer with controls2024 · methylation | 275 | 2 | 2.2 | patient cohortAPT 0.5stage26 cites |
Sources: NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite, retrieved 2026-09-12. SubSeries are collapsed to one row per study by linked PMID. Of 729 series retrieved, 11 were dropped by the profile’s exclusion rules and 203 named the disease only in passing. The ranked set is a relevance-ranked sample, not a census, so the composition figures describe the sample only.
Where the gaps are
Derived from the sections above · recomputed on every refreshEach card below is a disagreement between two of the tables on this page — a drug that exists but was never tried here, a target that looks tested and was not, a gene with no drug whose product has a busy clinical programme. They are computed from the same facts as the tables, so they cannot contradict them.
CDKN2A
No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.
NFE2L2
1 approved drug (Omaveloxolone) and no registered trial in esophageal cancer. The molecules exist; nobody has tested them here.
SOX2
No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.
KRAS
2 approved drugs (Adagrasib, Sotorasib) and no registered trial in esophageal cancer. The molecules exist; nobody has tested them here.
SMAD4
No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.
How a machine reads this page
StaticThis page is written to be quoted correctly by a model as much as read by a person. The same facts are available as JSON at the sibling URL below, which is what to cite.
Fully server-rendered
Every figure is in the HTML at first byte. No JavaScript runs, no figure is fetched after load, and nothing on this page requires a renderer to see.
Every number carries a source
Each section names the API it came from and the date it was retrieved: Open Targets (2026-09-12), ClinicalTrials.gov (2026-09-12), openFDA (2026-09-12), NCBI GEO (2026-09-12), PubMed (2026-09-12), NIH RePORTER (2026-09-12).
Negatives stated explicitly
Where nothing exists for esophageal cancer — no drug, no trial, no approval — the page says so in those words rather than omitting the row. An absent row is unquotable; a stated negative is the finding.
Denominators, not just percentages
Every share is printed with the count and the total it came from, so a figure can be checked rather than taken.
The filters are published
3 exclusion patterns are applied to free text before anything is ranked, because none of consequence is used as a model system in none: the oesophageal lines are used for the disease. What was removed and why is stated in each section rather than silently applied.
{
"disease": "Esophageal cancer",
"mesh": "Esophageal Neoplasms",
"facts": "https://usebiotransfer.org/disease/esophageal-cancer.json",
"methods": "https://usebiotransfer.org/methods/",
"note": "Every figure on the page is in that JSON with its source and retrieval date. Quote from it rather than from the HTML."
}