Target landscape
Open Targets · retrieved 2026-09-12 · weekly12 genes recurrently implicated in gastric cancer, triaged for whether anything can actually be aimed at them. The zeros are the informative rows.
Of 12 recurrently implicated genes, 9 carry any drug at all. That is a statement about these 12 gene targets, not about the disease: Gastric cancer does have labelled therapy — 9 drugs, listed in the next section.
Two different questions
The table below asks what can be aimed at 12 recurrently implicated genes. That is narrower than what is approved for the disease, and narrower again than what gastric cancer is actually treated with, which includes agents approved under broader indications. All three are on this page and they are kept apart deliberately.
| Gene | Drugs | Approval, and whether it reached this disease | Open Targets tractabilitycomputed from protein features and literature — a signal that a modality is worth trying, not evidence that it works | Cell therapy here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERBB2 across cancers → | 45 | 17 approvedAfatinib, Afatinib Dimaleate, Dacomitinib, Lapatinib, Lapatinib Ditosylate, Margetuximab, Masoprocol, Neratinib, Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan, Trastuzumab Duocarmazine, Trastuzumab Emtansine, Tucatinib, Vandetanib, Zanidatamab, ZenocutuzumabApproved in gastric cancer: Trastuzumab.136 active of 321 gastric cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | 1 active of 4 trials |
| CLDN18 across cancers → | 1 | 1 approvedZolbetuximabApproved in gastric cancer: Zolbetuximab.10 active of 15 gastric cancer trials | antibody | 8 active of 14 trials |
| FGFR2 | 26 | 10 approvedE-7090, Erdafitinib, Futibatinib, Infigratinib, Nintedanib, Nintedanib Esylate, Palifermin, Pemigatinib, Regorafenib, TraferminApproved in biliary tract cancer, urothelial carcinoma, urinary bladder carcinoma and 11 other indications. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.7 active of 42 gastric cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| MET across cancers → | 36 | 6 approvedAmivantamab, Cabozantinib, Cabozantinib S-Malate, Capmatinib, Crizotinib, TepotinibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma, thyroid cancer, thyroid tumor and 3 other indications. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.8 active of 29 gastric cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| TP53 across cancers → | 8 | Phase 3Alrizomadlin, Cenersen, Contusugene Ladenovec, Eprenetapopt, Idasanutlin, Navtemadlin, Siremadlin, Teprasiran3 trials, none active | other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| CDH1 | 0 | No drug— | antibody, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| PIK3CA across cancers → | 31 | 3 approvedAlpelisib, Copanlisib, InavolisibApproved in breast cancer, breast neoplasm, breast carcinoma and 3 other indications. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.3 active of 7 gastric cancer trials | antibody, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| KRAS across cancers → | 3 | 2 approvedAdagrasib, SotorasibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.Tried and abandoned: all 1 gastric cancer trials withdrawn before enrolling | antibody, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| ARID1A across cancers → | 0 | No drug— | protein degrader | — |
| RHOA | 0 | No drug— | antibody, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| CD274 across cancers → | 13 | 5 approvedAtezolizumab, Avelumab, Cosibelimab, Durvalumab, SugemalimabApproved in gastric cancer: Durvalumab.51 active of 101 gastric cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
| KDR across cancers → | 70 | 19 approvedAxitinib, Cabozantinib, Cabozantinib S-Malate, Cediranib, Fruquintinib, Lenvatinib, Midostaurin, Nintedanib, Nintedanib Esylate, Pazopanib, Ramucirumab, Regorafenib, Rivoceranib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Sunitinib Malate, Surufatinib, Tivozanib, VandetanibApproved in gastric cancer: Ramucirumab.69 active of 224 gastric cancer trials | antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule | — |
Dataset evidence counts studies in the 665-study ranked set whose title or abstract names the gene; the bar is scaled to TP53. Sources: Open Targets Platform and NCBI GEO, retrieved 2026-09-12. Clinical stage is the highest reached for any indication — see the per-drug indications noted in each row. Target-prioritisation reference only; not clinical or prescribing guidance.
What is actually approved here
openFDA drug labels · weekly9 drugs carry an FDA label naming gastric cancer: Durvalumab, Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-Nxki, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ramucirumab, Tislelizumab, Trastuzumab, Trifluridine And Tipiracil, Zolbetuximab. Separately, 53 of the drugs returned for the genes in the table above are approved only for other diseases and reach gastric cancer through trials, not through their labels.
Every label that names gastric cancer
| Drug | Role | What the label says |
|---|---|---|
| DurvalumabIMFINZI | Labelled here | in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, followed by single agent IMFINZI, for the treatment of adult patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). |
| Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-NxkiEnhertu | Labelled here | HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH positive) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have received a prior trastuzumab-based regimen. |
| NivolumabOPDIVO, OPDIVO QVANTIG | Labelled here | Gastric Cancer, Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma • adult patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1) in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy. |
| PembrolizumabKEYTRUDA, KEYTRUDA QLEX | Labelled here | Gastric Cancer KEYTRUDA, in combination with trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS ≥1) as determined by an FDA-authorized test [see Dosage and Administration |
| RamucirumabCYRAMZA | Labelled here | Gastric Cancer CYRAMZA ® , as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel, is indicated for the treatment of adults with advanced or metastatic, gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with disease progression on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy. |
| TislelizumabTEVIMBRA | Labelled here | Gastric Cancer in combination with platinum and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in adults for the first line treatment of unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1). |
| TrastuzumabHERZUMA, Herceptin, Kanjinti | Labelled here | Metastatic Gastric Cancer Ogivri is indicated in adults, in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil, for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease. |
| Trifluridine And TipiracilLONSURF | Labelled here | metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma previously treated with at least two prior lines of chemotherapy that included a fluoropyrimidine, a platinum, either a taxane or irinotecan, and if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy. |
| ZolbetuximabVYLOY | Labelled here | VYLOY, in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‑negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors are claudin (CLDN) 18.2 positive as determined by an FDA-approved test [see Dosage an... |
| CapecitabineCAPECITABINE, Capecitabine, XELODA | Backbone | treatment of adults with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease as a component of a combination regimen. |
| DocetaxelBEIZRAY, DOCETAXEL, DOCIVYX | Backbone | Gastric Adenocarcinoma (GC): with cisplatin and fluorouracil for untreated, advanced GC, including the gastroesophageal junction |
| FluorouracilFAVLYXA, FLUOROURACIL, Fluorouracil | Backbone | Gastric Adenocarcinoma |
1 labels match indications_and_usage:"gastric cancer" OR indications_and_usage:"gastric adenocarcinoma" OR indications_and_usage:"gastric or gastroesophageal junction" OR indications_and_usage:"stomach cancer"; they collapse to 12 distinct molecules once salt forms, biosimilars and co-formulated hyaluronidase are merged. Source: openFDA drug label API (api.fda.gov/drug/label.json), retrieved 2026-09-12. Labels change; this reflects the current label text, not the approval history. Not prescribing guidance.
Cell therapy against CEA
ClinicalTrials.gov · retrieved 2026-09-12 · weeklyCEA is the busiest cell-therapy antigen in gastric cancer: 16 registered trials, 5 still active, 3 withdrawn before enrolling anyone. It has no gene entry of its own and is reached through CEACAM5: a form or product of that gene.
| Trial | Phase | Status | Title | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT06043466 | 1 | Recruiting | A Clinical Trial Targeting CEA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) for CEA Positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors | 2023-09-21 |
| NCT06010862 | 1 | Recruiting | Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors | 2023-11-08 |
| NCT06126406 | 1 | Recruiting | Clinical Study of CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes(CAR-T) for CEA Positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors | 2023-11-13 |
| NCT07179692 | 1 | Recruiting | CEA-Targeted CAR-T Therapy in CEA-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors | 2025-10-02 |
| NCT06821048 | 1 | Recruiting | Study of CEA Targeting CAR-T (PTC13) in the Treatment of CEA-Positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors | 2026-01-23 |
| NCT00429078 | 1 | Withdrawn | Trial of 2nd Generation Anti-CEA Designer T Cells in Gastric Cancer | 2012-03-02 |
| NCT01723306 | 2 | Suspended | Phase II/Pilot Study of 2nd Generation Anti-CEA Designer T Cells in Adenocarcinomas | 2016-06-14 |
| NCT02349724 | 1 | Unknown | A Clinical Research of CAR T Cells Targeting CEA Positive Cancer | 2017-04-25 |
| NCT02416466 | 1 | Completed | CAR-T Hepatic Artery Infusions and Sir-Spheres for Liver Metastases | 2019-03-26 |
| NCT02850536 | 1 | Completed | CAR-T Hepatic Artery Infusions or Pancreatic Venous Infusions for CEA-Expressing Liver Metastases or Pancreas Cancer | 2021-10-21 |
10 of 16 shown, most recently active first. Other antigens searched: CLDN18.2 (14), PD-1 (8), HER2 (4), TROP2 (1). Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, retrieved 2026-09-12. Trials are matched on the antigen named in the title or intervention, so a trial stating only a product code is missed.
Research momentum
PubMed MeSH · monthlyEvery term below is a share of the gastric cancer literature, not a count, because the field itself grew: 2015–2018 (n=6,000) against 2021–2025 (n=6,000). A topic whose papers doubled while the field doubled has not risen.
These are sample shares. The two windows hold 12,935 and 19,096 papers; MeSH terms were read from an evenly spaced sample of 6,000 and 6,000 of them, taken across the whole window rather than from its most recent papers. Percentages carry sampling error of roughly a percentage point and small differences between two terms are not meaningful.
Rising, with a real baseline
| MeSH term | 2015–18 | 2021–25 | Change | Share now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | 0.13% | 1.55% | 11.62× | 93 papers |
| Tumor Microenvironment | 0.88% | 8.18% | 9.26× | 491 papers |
| Claudins | 0.15% | 1.15% | 7.66× | 69 papers |
| Immunotherapy | 0.7% | 4.6% | 6.57× | 276 papers |
| Immunoconjugates | 0.08% | 0.52% | 6.19× | 31 papers |
| Gastrointestinal Neoplasms | 0.12% | 0.68% | 5.85× | 41 papers |
| Organoids | 0.12% | 0.63% | 5.42× | 38 papers |
| Nomograms | 0.53% | 2.78% | 5.22× | 167 papers |
| Multicenter Studies as Topic | 0.08% | 0.4% | 4.8× | 24 papers |
| Traction | 0.08% | 0.38% | 4.6× | 23 papers |
Cooling
| MeSH term | 2015–18 | 2021–25 | Change | Share now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival Analysis | 4.98% | 0.35% | 0.07× | 21 papers |
| Multivariate Analysis | 2.93% | 0.22% | 0.07× | 13 papers |
| Neoplasm Grading | 2.48% | 0.2% | 0.08× | 12 papers |
| Tumor Cells, Cultured | 2.3% | 0.22% | 0.09× | 13 papers |
| Odds Ratio | 1.75% | 0.2% | 0.11× | 12 papers |
| Gene Knockdown Techniques | 1.73% | 0.25% | 0.14× | 15 papers |
Biggest topics now
| MeSH term | 2015–18 | 2021–25 | Change | Share now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prognosis | 21.97% | 21.98% | 1.0× | 1319 papers |
| Gastrectomy | 20.6% | 18.67% | 0.91× | 1120 papers |
| Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic | 16.1% | 14.73% | 0.92× | 884 papers |
| Adenocarcinoma | 18.08% | 13.27% | 0.73× | 796 papers |
| Cell Proliferation | 14.4% | 13.17% | 0.91× | 790 papers |
| Biomarkers, Tumor | 13.03% | 12.02% | 0.92× | 721 papers |
| Treatment Outcome | 13.48% | 10.42% | 0.77× | 625 papers |
| Tumor Microenvironment | 0.88% | 8.18% | 9.26× | 491 papers |
| Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 8.28% | 8.03% | 0.97× | 482 papers |
| Esophageal Neoplasms | 5.75% | 7.6% | 1.32× | 456 papers |
Publication mix
| Type | 2015–18 | 2021–25 |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Randomized Controlled Trial | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Review | 8.5% | 7.8% |
| Meta-Analysis | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Case Reports | 0.0% | 3.0% |
Query: Stomach Neoplasms[MeSH Major Topic] NOT ("Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors"[MeSH] OR "Neuroendocrine Tumors"[MeSH] OR "Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone"[MeSH]). Terms need at least 12 papers in the recent window and, in the rising table, at least 5 in the earlier one — a term going from 1 paper to 12 is a large fold change and no evidence of anything. Ubiquitous descriptors (Humans, Animals, age bands) and the disease’s own term are dropped. Windows are read whole where they fit and sampled where they do not; the totals and the sample sizes are both in the JSON beside this page. Source: PubMed MeSH, retrieved 2026-09-12.
Disease burden
What the public sources count, and how closely each category matches this disease. The same figures for every disease on the site are on one table.
| Measure | Value | Match | What it counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| New cases each year | 31,510 cases/year | direct | 2026 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Deaths each year | 10,740 deaths/year | direct | 2026 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Incidence rate | 7.5 cases per 100,000 people per year | direct | 2019-2023 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Death rate | 2.7 deaths per 100,000 people per year | direct | 2020-2024 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| People living with it | 150,727 people living with the disease | direct | 2023 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Median age at diagnosis | 68.0 years | direct | 2019-2023 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| median age at death | 71 years | direct | 2020-2024 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
| Five-year relative survival | 39.8% | direct | 2016-2022 SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Stomach Cancer, retrieved 2026-09-12 |
Years of life lost
6.3 years per case, 197,278 a year, from survival and age at diagnosis rather than from a death count. derived proxy What this costs to fund is in Funding.
3 assumptions behind this estimate
- Five-year relative survival stands in for cure; a death after five years is not counted.
- The median age at diagnosis stands in for the whole age distribution.
- Life expectancy at birth (78.4 years) is the reference, rather than remaining expectancy at the age of death from a life table.
- Each assumption moves the result by more than the difference between the two diseases currently on this site, so this figure separates a disease from one ten times its size, not from a close neighbour.
Funding
NIH RePORTER · quarterlyNIH obligations naming gastric cancer, after removing the 4,765 records across all years that matched the search but are about something else. That filter is not cosmetic: without it this section reports another field’s funding as this disease’s.
NIH obligations by fiscal year
| Year | Obligations | Awards | Distinct projects | Dropped as off-topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2013 | $9.0M | 32 | 29 | 369 |
| FY2014 | $8.7M | 29 | 27 | 357 |
| FY2015 | $10.4M | 33 | 21 | 383 |
| FY2016 | $10.6M | 25 | 18 | 316 |
| FY2017 | $9.8M | 26 | 22 | 319 |
| FY2018 | $9.8M | 23 | 23 | 409 |
| FY2019 | $10.5M | 26 | 24 | 372 |
| FY2020 | $10.0M | 29 | 24 | 368 |
| FY2021 | $12.4M | 34 | 31 | 367 |
| FY2022 | $17.7M | 38 | 34 | 378 |
| FY2023 | $20.3M | 43 | 37 | 387 |
| FY2024 | $23.7M | 51 | 40 | 377 |
| FY2025 | $26.4M | 52 | 41 | 363 |
Where FY2025 money went
| Institution | Obligations | Awards |
|---|---|---|
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | $5.8M | 6 |
| Columbia University Health Sciences | $3.8M | 5 |
| Stanford University | $3.1M | 5 |
| University Of Tx Md Anderson Can Ctr | $1.6M | 5 |
| Wake Forest University Health Sciences | $1.4M | 2 |
| University Of Miami School Of Medicine | $1.4M | 2 |
| Sloan-Kettering Inst Can Research | $1.3M | 4 |
| Ut Southwestern Medical Center | $1.3M | 2 |
| Collagen Medical, Llc | $1.1M | 0 |
| Division Of Cancer Epidemiology And Genetics | $1.0M | 3 |
Text search gastric cancer over project title, terms and abstract, per fiscal year. Awards are individual funding actions; distinct projects collapse them by core project number, so a multi-year grant counts once. The most recent year may be incomplete. Source: NIH RePORTER, retrieved 2026-09-12.
What that buys
Against 197,278 years of life lost a year, FY2025 obligations are $134 per life-year — $836 per case. The estimate and its assumptions are in Disease burden.
Who funds it, FY2025
The total says how much. These say who from, through what kind of award, and to whom — which a dollar figure cannot.
NIH institutes
Projects by administering institute. The rows above are the top 6 and account for 52 of 52.
Award mechanisms
R01 is an investigator-initiated grant; ZIA is NIH intramural, meaning the work happens inside NIH rather than being funded outside it. The rows above are the top 15 and account for 50 of 52.
Where it lands
Share of $26.4M in FY2025. The top three hold 48%.
Public datasets, ranked
NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite · weekly1,211 human GEO series match gastric cancer. Keyword relevance cannot tell a 2,934-sample patient cohort from a six-well cell-line experiment, so this ranking scores four things GEO does not expose: how often the accession is named in full-text papers, field-normalised citation impact, clinical annotation, and cohort type.
Composition of the 665-study ranked set
Established
high reuse, older| Accession | Study | Samples | MentionsEurope PMC | RCR | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE62254 | Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study [gastric tumors]2015 · array | 300 | 903 | 55.2 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecularPIK3CATP531,785 cites |
| GSE26253 | Gene expression profiling of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue identifies gastric cancer patients who are at high risk after curative surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy2014 · array | 432 | 205 | 10.9 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalstagemolecular336 cites |
| GSE13861 | Gene expression signature-based novel prognostic risk score in gastric cancer2011 · array | 90 | 231 | 10.9 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecular336 cites |
| GSE66229 | Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study2015 · array | 400 | 343 | 10.9 | APT 0.95survival336 cites |
| GSE183904 | Single-cell atlas of lineage states, tumor microenvironment and subtype specific expression programs in gastric cancer2021 · single-cell | 40 | 252 | 29.5 | mixedAPT 0.75466 cites |
| GSE84437 | Molecular subtypes in gastric cancer.2018 · array | 483 | 630 | 5.9 | APT 0.95189 cites |
| GSE134520 | Dissecting the single-cell transcriptome network underlying gastric premalignant lesions and early gastric cancer [10x genomics]2019 · single-cell | 13 | 201 | 11.9 | patient cohortAPT 0.75molecular362 cites |
| GSE122401 | Proteogenomic characterization of human early-onset gastric cancer2018 · sequencing | 160 | 41 | 8.5 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecular251 cites |
Recent
2022 onward, by score| Accession | Study | Samples | MentionsEurope PMC | RCR | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE163558 | Transcriptional heterogeneity in primary and metastatic gastric cancer revealed using single-cell RNA sequencing2022 · single-cell | 10 | 150 | 14.3 | APT 0.75molecular229 cites |
| GSE183136 | Development and Validation of a Prognostic and Predictive 32-Gene Signature for Gastric Cancer2022 · array | 135 | 20 | 5.7 | patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecular91 cites |
| GSE150290 | Characterization of heterogeneity in gastric cancer cells derived from independent lineages at single-cell resolution2022 · single-cell | 52 | 51 | 8.6 | APT 0.75survival133 cites |
| GSE206785 | Parallel single cell and bulk transcriptome analyses reveal key features of the gastric tumor microenvironment2022 · single-cell | 48 | 35 | 5.3 | patient cohortAPT 0.7597 cites |
| GSE234129 | Evolution of immune and stromal cell states and ecotypes during gastric adenocarcinoma progression2023 · single-cell | 17 | 14 | 12.8 | APT 0.5survivalstagemolecular89 cites |
| GSE251950 | Spatial transcriptomics of gastric cancers (Visium 10X platform)2023 · spatial | 10 | 41 | 15.6 | APT 0.5molecular62 cites |
Sources: NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite, retrieved 2026-09-12. SubSeries are collapsed to one row per study by linked PMID. Of 1,211 series retrieved, 27 were dropped by the profile’s exclusion rules and 402 named the disease only in passing. The ranked set is a relevance-ranked sample, not a census, so the composition figures describe the sample only.
Where the gaps are
Derived from the sections above · recomputed on every refreshEach card below is a disagreement between two of the tables on this page — a drug that exists but was never tried here, a target that looks tested and was not, a gene with no drug whose product has a busy clinical programme. They are computed from the same facts as the tables, so they cannot contradict them.
CDH1
No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.
KRAS
1 registered trial, 1 withdrawn before enrolling anyone and none active. This target reads as tried; it was not.
ARID1A
No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.
RHOA
No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.
How a machine reads this page
StaticThis page is written to be quoted correctly by a model as much as read by a person. The same facts are available as JSON at the sibling URL below, which is what to cite.
Fully server-rendered
Every figure is in the HTML at first byte. No JavaScript runs, no figure is fetched after load, and nothing on this page requires a renderer to see.
Every number carries a source
Each section names the API it came from and the date it was retrieved: Open Targets (2026-09-12), ClinicalTrials.gov (2026-09-12), openFDA (2026-09-12), NCBI GEO (2026-09-12), PubMed (2026-09-12), NIH RePORTER (2026-09-12).
Negatives stated explicitly
Where nothing exists for gastric cancer — no drug, no trial, no approval — the page says so in those words rather than omitting the row. An absent row is unquotable; a stated negative is the finding.
Denominators, not just percentages
Every share is printed with the count and the total it came from, so a figure can be checked rather than taken.
The filters are published
4 exclusion patterns are applied to free text before anything is ranked, because AGS is used as a model system in Helicobacter pylori infection biology, where AGS is the host cell. What was removed and why is stated in each section rather than silently applied.
{
"disease": "Gastric cancer",
"mesh": "Stomach Neoplasms",
"facts": "https://usebiotransfer.org/disease/gastric-cancer.json",
"methods": "https://usebiotransfer.org/methods/",
"note": "Every figure on the page is in that JSON with its source and retrieval date. Quote from it rather than from the HTML."
}