Disease Briefing

Gastric cancer: research and therapeutic landscape

A live synthesis of what is being targeted, what is being trialled, which datasets exist, and where the actionable gaps sit — assembled from public APIs, with every figure traceable to its source.

Generated 2026-09-12Sources Open Targets · ClinicalTrials.gov · openFDA · GEO · PubMed · Europe PMC · iCite · RePORTERRanked 665 studies · 24,173 GEO samples
Reading as
Reorders emphasis only — nothing is hidden or loaded on demand.

Answer block

12 genes recurrently implicated in gastric cancer — ERBB2, CLDN18, FGFR2, MET, TP53, CDH1, PIK3CA, KRAS, ARID1A, RHOA, CD274, KDR — triaged for what can actually be aimed at them, alongside the trials, public datasets, literature and funding around the disease. Every figure below carries its source and retrieval date in the section it comes from.

9
drugs carry an FDA label naming gastric cancer: Durvalumab, Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-Nxki, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ramucirumab, Tislelizumab and 3 more. This counts labels, not treatment — the disease is also treated with agents approved under broader indications
4
of the 12 genes above carry a drug that is approved in gastric cancer itself — CD274, CLDN18, ERBB2, KDR. Across all of them 246 drug entries reach these genes, 233 distinct once salt forms are merged
16
registered CEA cell-therapy trials in gastric cancer, 5 active and 3 withdrawn. Counted from ClinicalTrials.gov across 2 synonyms, deduplicated by NCT id, interventional studies only — the query is published in the JSON beside this page so the number can be re-derived
3
targets carry an Open Targets tractability signal and have no clinical programme of any kind: CDH1, ARID1A, RHOA. ERBB2, CLDN18 have cell-therapy trials, so they are undrugged rather than untouched
1,211
human GEO series match the disease; 665 survive on-topic filtering, and only 30 are patient cohorts of 100+ samples
903
Europe PMC full-text papers name GSE62254 — the highest accession-mention count in the set. A mention is not proof of reanalysis, so read it as reach rather than reuse
$26.4M
NIH obligations in FY2025, up 194% since 2013 — while distinct core projects went 29 to 41. Larger awards rather than more distinct core projects; core projects are not the same unit as laboratories

Target landscape

Open Targets · retrieved 2026-09-12 · weekly

12 genes recurrently implicated in gastric cancer, triaged for whether anything can actually be aimed at them. The zeros are the informative rows.

Of 12 recurrently implicated genes, 9 carry any drug at all. That is a statement about these 12 gene targets, not about the disease: Gastric cancer does have labelled therapy — 9 drugs, listed in the next section.

Two different questions

The table below asks what can be aimed at 12 recurrently implicated genes. That is narrower than what is approved for the disease, and narrower again than what gastric cancer is actually treated with, which includes agents approved under broader indications. All three are on this page and they are kept apart deliberately.

GeneDrugsApproval, and whether it reached this diseaseOpen Targets tractabilitycomputed from protein features and literature — a signal that a modality is worth trying, not evidence that it worksCell therapy here
ERBB2 across cancers → 45 17 approvedAfatinib, Afatinib Dimaleate, Dacomitinib, Lapatinib, Lapatinib Ditosylate, Margetuximab, Masoprocol, Neratinib, Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan, Trastuzumab Duocarmazine, Trastuzumab Emtansine, Tucatinib, Vandetanib, Zanidatamab, ZenocutuzumabApproved in gastric cancer: Trastuzumab.136 active of 321 gastric cancer trials antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule 1 active of 4 trials
CLDN18 across cancers → 1 1 approvedZolbetuximabApproved in gastric cancer: Zolbetuximab.10 active of 15 gastric cancer trials antibody 8 active of 14 trials
FGFR2 26 10 approvedE-7090, Erdafitinib, Futibatinib, Infigratinib, Nintedanib, Nintedanib Esylate, Palifermin, Pemigatinib, Regorafenib, TraferminApproved in biliary tract cancer, urothelial carcinoma, urinary bladder carcinoma and 11 other indications. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.7 active of 42 gastric cancer trials antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule
MET across cancers → 36 6 approvedAmivantamab, Cabozantinib, Cabozantinib S-Malate, Capmatinib, Crizotinib, TepotinibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma, thyroid cancer, thyroid tumor and 3 other indications. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.8 active of 29 gastric cancer trials antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule
TP53 across cancers → 8 Phase 3Alrizomadlin, Cenersen, Contusugene Ladenovec, Eprenetapopt, Idasanutlin, Navtemadlin, Siremadlin, Teprasiran3 trials, none active other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule
CDH1 0 No drug antibody, protein degrader, small molecule
PIK3CA across cancers → 31 3 approvedAlpelisib, Copanlisib, InavolisibApproved in breast cancer, breast neoplasm, breast carcinoma and 3 other indications. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.3 active of 7 gastric cancer trials antibody, protein degrader, small molecule
KRAS across cancers → 3 2 approvedAdagrasib, SotorasibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma. No gastric cancer indication appears on these drugs’ labels.Tried and abandoned: all 1 gastric cancer trials withdrawn before enrolling antibody, protein degrader, small molecule
ARID1A across cancers → 0 No drug protein degrader
RHOA 0 No drug antibody, protein degrader, small molecule
CD274 across cancers → 13 5 approvedAtezolizumab, Avelumab, Cosibelimab, Durvalumab, SugemalimabApproved in gastric cancer: Durvalumab.51 active of 101 gastric cancer trials antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule
KDR across cancers → 70 19 approvedAxitinib, Cabozantinib, Cabozantinib S-Malate, Cediranib, Fruquintinib, Lenvatinib, Midostaurin, Nintedanib, Nintedanib Esylate, Pazopanib, Ramucirumab, Regorafenib, Rivoceranib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Sunitinib Malate, Surufatinib, Tivozanib, VandetanibApproved in gastric cancer: Ramucirumab.69 active of 224 gastric cancer trials antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule

Dataset evidence counts studies in the 665-study ranked set whose title or abstract names the gene; the bar is scaled to TP53. Sources: Open Targets Platform and NCBI GEO, retrieved 2026-09-12. Clinical stage is the highest reached for any indication — see the per-drug indications noted in each row. Target-prioritisation reference only; not clinical or prescribing guidance.

What is actually approved here

openFDA drug labels · weekly

9 drugs carry an FDA label naming gastric cancer: Durvalumab, Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-Nxki, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ramucirumab, Tislelizumab, Trastuzumab, Trifluridine And Tipiracil, Zolbetuximab. Separately, 53 of the drugs returned for the genes in the table above are approved only for other diseases and reach gastric cancer through trials, not through their labels.

9Labelled for gastric cancerFDA INDICATIONS AND USAGE names the disease
53Approved, but for another diseasereturned for the genes in the table above
3Backbone agents listing itbroad cytotoxics whose labels name many tumours
5Active CEA cell-therapy trialsof 16 registered

Every label that names gastric cancer

DrugRoleWhat the label says
DurvalumabIMFINZILabelled herein combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, followed by single agent IMFINZI, for the treatment of adult patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC).
Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-NxkiEnhertuLabelled hereHER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH positive) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have received a prior trastuzumab-based regimen.
NivolumabOPDIVO, OPDIVO QVANTIGLabelled hereGastric Cancer, Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma • adult patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1) in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy.
PembrolizumabKEYTRUDA, KEYTRUDA QLEXLabelled hereGastric Cancer KEYTRUDA, in combination with trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS ≥1) as determined by an FDA-authorized test [see Dosage and Administration
RamucirumabCYRAMZALabelled hereGastric Cancer CYRAMZA ® , as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel, is indicated for the treatment of adults with advanced or metastatic, gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with disease progression on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy.
TislelizumabTEVIMBRALabelled hereGastric Cancer in combination with platinum and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in adults for the first line treatment of unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1).
TrastuzumabHERZUMA, Herceptin, KanjintiLabelled hereMetastatic Gastric Cancer Ogivri is indicated in adults, in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil, for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease.
Trifluridine And TipiracilLONSURFLabelled heremetastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma previously treated with at least two prior lines of chemotherapy that included a fluoropyrimidine, a platinum, either a taxane or irinotecan, and if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy.
ZolbetuximabVYLOYLabelled hereVYLOY, in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‑negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors are claudin (CLDN) 18.2 positive as determined by an FDA-approved test [see Dosage an...
CapecitabineCAPECITABINE, Capecitabine, XELODABackbonetreatment of adults with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease as a component of a combination regimen.
DocetaxelBEIZRAY, DOCETAXEL, DOCIVYXBackboneGastric Adenocarcinoma (GC): with cisplatin and fluorouracil for untreated, advanced GC, including the gastroesophageal junction
FluorouracilFAVLYXA, FLUOROURACIL, FluorouracilBackboneGastric Adenocarcinoma

1 labels match indications_and_usage:"gastric cancer" OR indications_and_usage:"gastric adenocarcinoma" OR indications_and_usage:"gastric or gastroesophageal junction" OR indications_and_usage:"stomach cancer"; they collapse to 12 distinct molecules once salt forms, biosimilars and co-formulated hyaluronidase are merged. Source: openFDA drug label API (api.fda.gov/drug/label.json), retrieved 2026-09-12. Labels change; this reflects the current label text, not the approval history. Not prescribing guidance.

Cell therapy against CEA

ClinicalTrials.gov · retrieved 2026-09-12 · weekly

CEA is the busiest cell-therapy antigen in gastric cancer: 16 registered trials, 5 still active, 3 withdrawn before enrolling anyone. It has no gene entry of its own and is reached through CEACAM5: a form or product of that gene.

TrialPhaseStatusTitleLast update
NCT060434661RecruitingA Clinical Trial Targeting CEA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) for CEA Positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors2023-09-21
NCT060108621RecruitingClinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors2023-11-08
NCT061264061RecruitingClinical Study of CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes(CAR-T) for CEA Positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors2023-11-13
NCT071796921RecruitingCEA-Targeted CAR-T Therapy in CEA-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors2025-10-02
NCT068210481RecruitingStudy of CEA Targeting CAR-T (PTC13) in the Treatment of CEA-Positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors2026-01-23
NCT004290781WithdrawnTrial of 2nd Generation Anti-CEA Designer T Cells in Gastric Cancer2012-03-02
NCT017233062SuspendedPhase II/Pilot Study of 2nd Generation Anti-CEA Designer T Cells in Adenocarcinomas2016-06-14
NCT023497241UnknownA Clinical Research of CAR T Cells Targeting CEA Positive Cancer2017-04-25
NCT024164661CompletedCAR-T Hepatic Artery Infusions and Sir-Spheres for Liver Metastases2019-03-26
NCT028505361CompletedCAR-T Hepatic Artery Infusions or Pancreatic Venous Infusions for CEA-Expressing Liver Metastases or Pancreas Cancer2021-10-21

10 of 16 shown, most recently active first. Other antigens searched: CLDN18.2 (14), PD-1 (8), HER2 (4), TROP2 (1). Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, retrieved 2026-09-12. Trials are matched on the antigen named in the title or intervention, so a trial stating only a product code is missed.

Research momentum

PubMed MeSH · monthly

Every term below is a share of the gastric cancer literature, not a count, because the field itself grew: 2015–2018 (n=6,000) against 2021–2025 (n=6,000). A topic whose papers doubled while the field doubled has not risen.

These are sample shares. The two windows hold 12,935 and 19,096 papers; MeSH terms were read from an evenly spaced sample of 6,000 and 6,000 of them, taken across the whole window rather than from its most recent papers. Percentages carry sampling error of roughly a percentage point and small differences between two terms are not meaningful.

Rising, with a real baseline

MeSH term2015–182021–25ChangeShare now
Nivolumab0.13%1.55%11.62×93 papers
Tumor Microenvironment0.88%8.18%9.26×491 papers
Claudins0.15%1.15%7.66×69 papers
Immunotherapy0.7%4.6%6.57×276 papers
Immunoconjugates0.08%0.52%6.19×31 papers
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms0.12%0.68%5.85×41 papers
Organoids0.12%0.63%5.42×38 papers
Nomograms0.53%2.78%5.22×167 papers
Multicenter Studies as Topic0.08%0.4%4.8×24 papers
Traction0.08%0.38%4.6×23 papers

Cooling

MeSH term2015–182021–25ChangeShare now
Survival Analysis4.98%0.35%0.07×21 papers
Multivariate Analysis2.93%0.22%0.07×13 papers
Neoplasm Grading2.48%0.2%0.08×12 papers
Tumor Cells, Cultured2.3%0.22%0.09×13 papers
Odds Ratio1.75%0.2%0.11×12 papers
Gene Knockdown Techniques1.73%0.25%0.14×15 papers

Biggest topics now

MeSH term2015–182021–25ChangeShare now
Prognosis21.97%21.98%1.0×1319 papers
Gastrectomy20.6%18.67%0.91×1120 papers
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic16.1%14.73%0.92×884 papers
Adenocarcinoma18.08%13.27%0.73×796 papers
Cell Proliferation14.4%13.17%0.91×790 papers
Biomarkers, Tumor13.03%12.02%0.92×721 papers
Treatment Outcome13.48%10.42%0.77×625 papers
Tumor Microenvironment0.88%8.18%9.26×491 papers
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols8.28%8.03%0.97×482 papers
Esophageal Neoplasms5.75%7.6%1.32×456 papers

Publication mix

Type2015–182021–25
Clinical Trial0.0%0.1%
Randomized Controlled Trial2.2%2.1%
Review8.5%7.8%
Meta-Analysis3.5%2.4%
Case Reports0.0%3.0%

Query: Stomach Neoplasms[MeSH Major Topic] NOT ("Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors"[MeSH] OR "Neuroendocrine Tumors"[MeSH] OR "Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone"[MeSH]). Terms need at least 12 papers in the recent window and, in the rising table, at least 5 in the earlier one — a term going from 1 paper to 12 is a large fold change and no evidence of anything. Ubiquitous descriptors (Humans, Animals, age bands) and the disease’s own term are dropped. Windows are read whole where they fit and sampled where they do not; the totals and the sample sizes are both in the JSON beside this page. Source: PubMed MeSH, retrieved 2026-09-12.

Disease burden

What the public sources count, and how closely each category matches this disease. The same figures for every disease on the site are on one table.

MeasureValueMatchWhat it counts
New cases each year31,510 cases/yeardirect2026
Deaths each year10,740 deaths/yeardirect2026
Incidence rate7.5 cases per 100,000 people per yeardirect2019-2023
Death rate2.7 deaths per 100,000 people per yeardirect2020-2024
People living with it150,727 people living with the diseasedirect2023
Median age at diagnosis68.0 yearsdirect2019-2023
median age at death71 yearsdirect2020-2024
Five-year relative survival39.8%direct2016-2022

Years of life lost

6.3 years per case, 197,278 a year, from survival and age at diagnosis rather than from a death count. derived proxy What this costs to fund is in Funding.

3 assumptions behind this estimate
  • Five-year relative survival stands in for cure; a death after five years is not counted.
  • The median age at diagnosis stands in for the whole age distribution.
  • Life expectancy at birth (78.4 years) is the reference, rather than remaining expectancy at the age of death from a life table.
  • Each assumption moves the result by more than the difference between the two diseases currently on this site, so this figure separates a disease from one ten times its size, not from a close neighbour.

Funding

NIH RePORTER · quarterly

NIH obligations naming gastric cancer, after removing the 4,765 records across all years that matched the search but are about something else. That filter is not cosmetic: without it this section reports another field’s funding as this disease’s.

$26.4MNIH obligations, FY2025from $9.0M in FY2013 · +194%
41distinct projects funded29 in FY2013
$26.4Mpeak year was FY2025obligations, all institutes
88%of FY2025 awards from NCI46 of 52

NIH obligations by fiscal year

$7M$13M$20M$26M13151719212325
YearObligationsAwardsDistinct projectsDropped as off-topic
FY2013$9.0M3229369
FY2014$8.7M2927357
FY2015$10.4M3321383
FY2016$10.6M2518316
FY2017$9.8M2622319
FY2018$9.8M2323409
FY2019$10.5M2624372
FY2020$10.0M2924368
FY2021$12.4M3431367
FY2022$17.7M3834378
FY2023$20.3M4337387
FY2024$23.7M5140377
FY2025$26.4M5241363

Where FY2025 money went

InstitutionObligationsAwards
Vanderbilt University Medical Center$5.8M6
Columbia University Health Sciences$3.8M5
Stanford University$3.1M5
University Of Tx Md Anderson Can Ctr$1.6M5
Wake Forest University Health Sciences$1.4M2
University Of Miami School Of Medicine$1.4M2
Sloan-Kettering Inst Can Research$1.3M4
Ut Southwestern Medical Center$1.3M2
Collagen Medical, Llc$1.1M0
Division Of Cancer Epidemiology And Genetics$1.0M3

Text search gastric cancer over project title, terms and abstract, per fiscal year. Awards are individual funding actions; distinct projects collapse them by core project number, so a multi-year grant counts once. The most recent year may be incomplete. Source: NIH RePORTER, retrieved 2026-09-12.

What that buys

Against 197,278 years of life lost a year, FY2025 obligations are $134 per life-year — $836 per case. The estimate and its assumptions are in Disease burden.

Who funds it, FY2025

The total says how much. These say who from, through what kind of award, and to whom — which a dollar figure cannot.

NIH institutes

NCI46 · 88%
VA2 · 4%
NIDDK1 · 2%
NIGMS1 · 2%
NHLBI1 · 2%
NIAID1 · 2%

Projects by administering institute. The rows above are the top 6 and account for 52 of 52.

Award mechanisms

R0117 · 33%
P018 · 15%
R375 · 10%
ZIA4 · 8%
U543 · 6%
K082 · 4%

R01 is an investigator-initiated grant; ZIA is NIH intramural, meaning the work happens inside NIH rather than being funded outside it. The rows above are the top 15 and account for 50 of 52.

Where it lands

Vanderbilt University Medical Center$5.8M · 22.0%
Columbia University Health Sciences$3.8M · 14.4%
Stanford University$3.1M · 11.9%
University Of Tx Md Anderson Can Ctr$1.6M · 5.9%
Wake Forest University Health Sciences$1.4M · 5.1%
University Of Miami School Of Medicine$1.4M · 5.1%

Share of $26.4M in FY2025. The top three hold 48%.

Public datasets, ranked

NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite · weekly

1,211 human GEO series match gastric cancer. Keyword relevance cannot tell a 2,934-sample patient cohort from a six-well cell-line experiment, so this ranking scores four things GEO does not expose: how often the accession is named in full-text papers, field-normalised citation impact, clinical annotation, and cohort type.

Composition of the 665-study ranked set

unspecified 218cell line 200patient 185mixed 57xenograft 5
218 unspecified200 cell line185 patient57 mixed5 xenograft368 carry clinical annotation167 carry survival30 patient cohorts ≥100 GEO samples24,173 GEO samples totalin 36 single-cell series a GEO sample is one cell, not one patient

Established

high reuse, older
AccessionStudySamplesMentionsEurope PMCRCREvidence
GSE62254Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study [gastric tumors]2015 · array30090355.2
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecularPIK3CATP531,785 cites
GSE26253Gene expression profiling of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue identifies gastric cancer patients who are at high risk after curative surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy2014 · array43220510.9
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalstagemolecular336 cites
GSE13861Gene expression signature-based novel prognostic risk score in gastric cancer2011 · array9023110.9
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecular336 cites
GSE66229Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study2015 · array40034310.9
APT 0.95survival336 cites
GSE183904Single-cell atlas of lineage states, tumor microenvironment and subtype specific expression programs in gastric cancer2021 · single-cell4025229.5
mixedAPT 0.75466 cites
GSE84437Molecular subtypes in gastric cancer.2018 · array4836305.9
APT 0.95189 cites
GSE134520Dissecting the single-cell transcriptome network underlying gastric premalignant lesions and early gastric cancer [10x genomics]2019 · single-cell1320111.9
patient cohortAPT 0.75molecular362 cites
GSE122401Proteogenomic characterization of human early-onset gastric cancer2018 · sequencing160418.5
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecular251 cites

Recent

2022 onward, by score
AccessionStudySamplesMentionsEurope PMCRCREvidence
GSE163558Transcriptional heterogeneity in primary and metastatic gastric cancer revealed using single-cell RNA sequencing2022 · single-cell1015014.3
APT 0.75molecular229 cites
GSE183136Development and Validation of a Prognostic and Predictive 32-Gene Signature for Gastric Cancer2022 · array135205.7
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalmolecular91 cites
GSE150290Characterization of heterogeneity in gastric cancer cells derived from independent lineages at single-cell resolution2022 · single-cell52518.6
APT 0.75survival133 cites
GSE206785Parallel single cell and bulk transcriptome analyses reveal key features of the gastric tumor microenvironment2022 · single-cell48355.3
patient cohortAPT 0.7597 cites
GSE234129Evolution of immune and stromal cell states and ecotypes during gastric adenocarcinoma progression2023 · single-cell171412.8
APT 0.5survivalstagemolecular89 cites
GSE251950Spatial transcriptomics of gastric cancers (Visium 10X platform)2023 · spatial104115.6
APT 0.5molecular62 cites

Sources: NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite, retrieved 2026-09-12. SubSeries are collapsed to one row per study by linked PMID. Of 1,211 series retrieved, 27 were dropped by the profile’s exclusion rules and 402 named the disease only in passing. The ranked set is a relevance-ranked sample, not a census, so the composition figures describe the sample only.

Where the gaps are

Derived from the sections above · recomputed on every refresh

Each card below is a disagreement between two of the tables on this page — a drug that exists but was never tried here, a target that looks tested and was not, a gene with no drug whose product has a busy clinical programme. They are computed from the same facts as the tables, so they cannot contradict them.

CDH1

No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.

KRAS

1 registered trial, 1 withdrawn before enrolling anyone and none active. This target reads as tried; it was not.

ARID1A

No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.

RHOA

No drug, no trial, no clinical programme of any kind. Whatever the biology says, nothing has been built.

How a machine reads this page

Static

This page is written to be quoted correctly by a model as much as read by a person. The same facts are available as JSON at the sibling URL below, which is what to cite.

Fully server-rendered

Every figure is in the HTML at first byte. No JavaScript runs, no figure is fetched after load, and nothing on this page requires a renderer to see.

Every number carries a source

Each section names the API it came from and the date it was retrieved: Open Targets (2026-09-12), ClinicalTrials.gov (2026-09-12), openFDA (2026-09-12), NCBI GEO (2026-09-12), PubMed (2026-09-12), NIH RePORTER (2026-09-12).

Negatives stated explicitly

Where nothing exists for gastric cancer — no drug, no trial, no approval — the page says so in those words rather than omitting the row. An absent row is unquotable; a stated negative is the finding.

Denominators, not just percentages

Every share is printed with the count and the total it came from, so a figure can be checked rather than taken.

The filters are published

4 exclusion patterns are applied to free text before anything is ranked, because AGS is used as a model system in Helicobacter pylori infection biology, where AGS is the host cell. What was removed and why is stated in each section rather than silently applied.

{
  "disease": "Gastric cancer",
  "mesh": "Stomach Neoplasms",
  "facts": "https://usebiotransfer.org/disease/gastric-cancer.json",
  "methods": "https://usebiotransfer.org/methods/",
  "note": "Every figure on the page is in that JSON with its source and retrieval date. Quote from it rather than from the HTML."
}