← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Effect of iPSC-derived megakaryocytes and platelets on gene expression of HUVEC

GSE260954 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 12 samples Submitted 2024/10/23 Platform GPL18573
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 12 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
12 samples: 3 × HUVEC, PBS, vs 3 × HUVEC, iMPs, vs 3 × HUVEC, PRP, vs 3 × HUVEC, FGF2,Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
iPSC-derived megakaryocytes and platelets accelerate wound healing and angiogenesisStem cell research & therapy · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which is prepared by concentrating platelets in autologous blood, shows efficacy in chronic skin wounds via multiple growth factors. However, it exhibits heterogeneity across patients, leading to unstable therapeutic efficacy. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived megakaryocytes and platelets (iMPs) are capable of providing a stable supply, holding promise as materials for novel therapies.
Read the full summary ↓
Thus, we evaluated the effect of iMPs on wound healing in vitro. iMPs specifically released FGF2 and exhibited superior enhancement on HUVEC proliferation compared to PRP. RNA-seq revealed that iMPs induce polarization to stalk cells and enhance ANGPTL4 gene expression in HUVECs. These mechanisms were suggested to provide the superior effects of iMPs.
Published in
iPSC-derived megakaryocytes and platelets accelerate wound healing and angiogenesis
Kosaka K, Takayama N, Paul SK et al. · Stem cell research & therapy 2024 · PMID 39402677 · doi:10.1186/s13287-024-03966-z
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE260954_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1084727 and SRA study SRP493593. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × HUVEC, PBS, vs 3 × HUVEC, iMPs, vs 3 × HUVEC, PRP, vs 3 × HUVEC, FGF2,

Supports a between-group comparison across 12 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 12 sample titles; they account for 12 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.