Vulvar cancer: research and therapeutic landscape

12 genes recurrently implicated in vulvar cancer, triaged for whether anything can actually be aimed at them. The zeros are the informative rows.

Of 12 recurrently implicated genes, 8 carry any drug at all. That is a statement about these 12 gene targets, not about the disease: Vulvar cancer does have labelled therapy — 1 drugs, listed in the next section.

Dataset evidence counts studies in the 8-study ranked set whose title or abstract names the gene; the bar is scaled to TP53. Sources: Open Targets Platform and NCBI GEO, retrieved 2026-09-30. Clinical stage is the highest reached for any indication — see the per-drug indications noted in each row. Target-prioritisation reference only; not clinical or prescribing guidance.

1 drug carries an FDA label naming vulvar cancer: Bleomycin. Separately, 26 of the drugs returned for the genes in the table above are approved only for other diseases and reach vulvar cancer through trials, not through their labels.

Every label that names vulvar cancer

6 labels carry a positive indication naming the disease under indications_and_usage:"vulvar cancer" OR indications_and_usage:"vulvar carcinoma" OR indications_and_usage:"carcinoma of the vulva" OR indications_and_usage:"vulva"; they collapse to 1 distinct molecules once salt forms, biosimilars and co-formulated hyaluronidase are merged. Source: openFDA drug label API (api.fda.gov/drug/label.json), retrieved 2026-09-18. Labels change; this reflects the current label text, not the approval history. Not prescribing guidance.

Labels that name vulvar cancer without indicating for it

A label can name a disease under Limitations of Use, in a contraindication or as a risk. These were read and are not counted above.

HPV E6/E7 is the busiest cell-therapy target among those this briefing searched in vulvar cancer: 1 registered trial naming it, 0 still active.

1 of 1 shown, most recently active first. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, retrieved 2026-09-18. A trial counts here when its registered conditions name vulvar cancer or a tumour-agnostic basket, its title names an administered cell product, and the title names this target: a HER2 CAR-T trial that adds a PD-1 antibody is a HER2 trial. A trial stating only a product code is missed.

Every term below is a share of the vulvar cancer literature, not a count, because the field itself grew: 2015–2018 (n=624) against 2021–2025 (n=763). A topic whose papers doubled while the field doubled has not risen.

Rising, with a real baseline

Cooling

Biggest topics now

Publication mix

Query: Vulvar Neoplasms[MeSH Major Topic] NOT ("Melanoma"[MeSH] OR "Paget Disease, Extramammary"[MeSH] OR "Vaginal Neoplasms"[MeSH] OR "Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia"[MeSH]). Terms need at least 12 papers in the recent window and, in the rising table, at least 5 in the earlier one — a term going from 1 paper to 12 is a large fold change and no evidence of anything. Ubiquitous descriptors (Humans, Animals, age bands) and the disease’s own term are dropped. Source: PubMed MeSH, retrieved 2026-09-12.

What the public sources count, and how closely each category matches this disease. The same figures for every disease on the site are on one table.

Years of life lost (proxy)

2.5 years per case, 18,147 a year, from survival and age at diagnosis rather than from a death count. derived proxy Not the WHO/GBD measure, which uses age at death and a life table; comparable across these briefings, not with published YLL figures. What this costs to fund is in Funding.

No NIH award attributable to vulvar cancer in any fiscal year FY2013–FY2025. RePORTER returned 384 records for vulvar cancer; none named the disease in its title or met the briefing’s mention floor, so every year filtered to zero. A search result over a stated filter, not proof that no such research is funded. Source: NIH RePORTER, retrieved 2026-09-20.

50 human GEO series match vulvar cancer. Keyword relevance cannot tell a 23-sample patient cohort from a six-well cell-line experiment, so this ranking scores four things GEO does not expose: how often the accession is named in full-text papers, field-normalised citation impact, clinical annotation, and cohort type.

Composition of the 8-study ranked set

Sources: NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite, retrieved 2026-09-19. SubSeries are collapsed to one row per study by linked PMID. Of 50 series retrieved, 5 were dropped by the profile’s exclusion rules and 34 named the disease only in passing. The ranked set is a relevance-ranked sample, not a census, so the composition figures describe the sample only.

Each card below is a disagreement between two of the tables on this page — a drug that exists but was never tried here, a target that looks tested and was not, a gene with no drug whose product has a busy clinical programme. They are computed from the same facts as the tables, so they cannot contradict them.

This page is written to be quoted correctly by a model as much as read by a person. The same facts are available as JSON at the sibling URL below, which is what to cite. The cross-disease layer — burden, genes, drugs and antigens across every briefing — is described at /disease/api.json.

{
  "disease": "Vulvar cancer",
  "mesh": "Vulvar Neoplasms",
  "facts": "https://usebiotransfer.org/disease/vulvar-cancer.json",
  "methods": "https://usebiotransfer.org/methods/",
  "all_diseases": "https://usebiotransfer.org/disease/api.json",
  "note": "Every figure on the page is in that JSON with its source and retrieval date. Quote from it rather than from the HTML."
}